Literature DB >> 20838113

Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive scheme on age, sex, and socioeconomic disparities in diabetes management in UK primary care.

Fiona Louise Hamilton1, Alex Bottle, Eszter Panna Vamos, Vasa Curcin, Anthea Ng, Mariam Molokhia, Azeem Majeed, Christopher Millett.   

Abstract

We examined the impact of a major pay-for-performance initiative introduced into UK primary care in 2004 on disparities in diabetes management between age, sex, and socioeconomic groups in this retrospective cohort study. We used data from the General Practice Research Database enrolling 422 family practices. Existing disparities in risk factor management (HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol) narrowed between men and women. Younger patients (<45 years) with diabetes appear to have benefited less from Quality and Outcomes Framework than older patients, resulting in some widening of existing age group disparities. Patients living in affluent and deprived areas appeared to have derived a similar level of benefit from pay for performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20838113     DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181f68f1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage        ISSN: 0148-9917


  13 in total

Review 1.  Improving measurement of primary care system performance.

Authors:  William Hogg; Elizabeth Dyke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Nishchay Mehta; Anne Schilder; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Ethnic and social disparity in glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes; cohort study in general practice 2004-9.

Authors:  Gareth D James; Peter Baker; Ellena Badrick; Rohini Mathur; Sally Hull; John Robson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Provider and patient directed financial incentives to improve care and outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Ilona S Lorincz; Brittany C T Lawson; Judith A Long
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Nationwide study on trends in hospital admissions for major cardiovascular events and procedures among people with and without diabetes in England, 2004-2009.

Authors:  Eszter P Vamos; Christopher Millett; Camille Parsons; Paul Aylin; Azeem Majeed; Alex Bottle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  The future of life expectancy and life expectancy inequalities in England and Wales: Bayesian spatiotemporal forecasting.

Authors:  James E Bennett; Guangquan Li; Kyle Foreman; Nicky Best; Vasilis Kontis; Clare Pearson; Peter Hambly; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  The impact of reimbursement systems on equity in access and quality of primary care: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Wenjing Tao; Janne Agerholm; Bo Burström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Gender differences in hospital admissions for major cardiovascular events and procedures in people with and without diabetes in England: a nationwide study 2004-2014.

Authors:  Anthony A Laverty; Alex Bottle; Sung-Hee Kim; Bhakti Visani; Azeem Majeed; Christopher Millett; Eszter P Vamos
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 9.951

9.  Pay-for-performance: impact on diabetes.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Evangelos Kontopantelis
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice.

Authors:  Carl de Wet; John McKay; Paul Bowie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.