Literature DB >> 20837956

Phase III randomized trial assessing rofecoxib in the adjuvant setting of colorectal cancer: final results of the VICTOR trial.

Rachel S Midgley1, Christopher C McConkey, Elaine C Johnstone, Janet A Dunn, Justine L Smith, Simon A Grumett, Patrick Julier, Claire Iveson, Yoko Yanagisawa, Bryan Warren, Michael J Langman, David J Kerr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laboratory and case-control studies suggest a pivotal role for the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. The purpose of this study was to test whether the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib could reduce recurrence and improve survival when administered in the adjuvant setting of colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone potentially curative surgery and completion of adjuvant therapy for stage II and III CRC were randomly assigned to receive rofecoxib (20 mg daily) or placebo. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Where formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples were available, COX-2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred thirty-four patients were entered onto the study. The trial was terminated early because of the worldwide withdrawal of rofecoxib. At this point, 1,167 patients had received rofecoxib and 1,160 patients had received placebo for median treatment durations of 7.4 and 8.2 months, respectively. For the rofecoxib and placebo arms, median follow-up times were 4.84 and 4.85 years, with 241 and 246 deaths and 297 and 329 recurrences, respectively. No difference was demonstrated in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.16; P = .75) or recurrence (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.04; P = .15) comparing the two groups. Tumor COX-2 expression by immunohistochemistry was assessed for 871 patients, but neither prognostic nor predictive effects were observed.
CONCLUSION: In this study of abbreviated therapy in the adjuvant setting of CRC, rofecoxib did not improve OS or protect from recurrence in unselected patients. In addition, COX-2 expression did not correlate with prognosis overall or predict effectiveness of COX-2 inhibitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20837956     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.6244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

1.  The utility of Aspirin in Dukes C and High Risk Dukes B Colorectal cancer--the ASCOLT study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Raghib Ali; Han-Chong Toh; Whay-Kuang Chia
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  COX-2 inhibitors in prostate cancer treatment--hold your horses?

Authors:  Ada S Cheung; Mathis Grossmann
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Prevention: will an aspirin a day keep the colorectal cancer away?

Authors:  Marianne Berg; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Clinical applicability and cost of a 46-gene panel for genomic analysis of solid tumours: Retrospective validation and prospective audit in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Angela Hamblin; Sarah Wordsworth; Jilles M Fermont; Suzanne Page; Kulvinder Kaur; Carme Camps; Pamela Kaisaki; Avinash Gupta; Denis Talbot; Mark Middleton; Shirley Henderson; Anthony Cutts; Dimitrios V Vavoulis; Nick Housby; Ian Tomlinson; Jenny C Taylor; Anna Schuh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Response.

Authors:  Kimmie Ng; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  RE: Aspirin and COX-2 Inhibitor Use in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Margaret Lee; Peter Gibbs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Preclinical predictors of anticancer drug efficacy: critical assessment with emphasis on whether nanomolar potency should be required of candidate agents.

Authors:  C C Wong; Ka-Wing Cheng; Basil Rigas
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 8.  Possible link between cyclooxygenase-inhibiting and antitumor properties of propofol.

Authors:  Takefumi Inada; Kozue Kubo; Koh Shingu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Association between COX-2 expression and effectiveness of COX-2 inhibitors in a phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Khaldoun Almhanna; Bassel El-Rayes; Seema Sethi; Gregory Dyson; Lance Heilbrun; Philip A Philip; Fazlul Sarkar
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 10.  TLR agonists: our best frenemy in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sabina Kaczanowska; Ann Mary Joseph; Eduardo Davila
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.