Literature DB >> 20837777

A process model of affect misattribution.

B Keith Payne1, Deborah L Hall, C Daryl Cameron, Anthony J Bishara.   

Abstract

People often misattribute the causes of their thoughts and feelings. The authors propose a multinomial process model of affect misattributions, which separates three component processes. The first is an affective response to the true cause of affect. The second is an affective response to the apparent cause. The third process is when the apparent source is confused for the real source. The model is validated using the affect misattribution procedure (AMP), which uses misattributions as a means to implicitly measure attitudes. The model illuminates not only the AMP but also other phenomena in which researchers wish to model the processes underlying misattributions using subjective judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20837777     DOI: 10.1177/0146167210383440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  11 in total

1.  Subliminal perception of others' physical pain and pleasure.

Authors:  Patrizia Andrea Chiesa; Marco Tullio Liuzza; Adriano Acciarino; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Implicit affective associations predict snack choice for those with low, but not high levels of eating disorder symptomatology.

Authors:  Erin M Ellis; Marc T Kiviniemi; Catherine Cook-Cottone
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Moving beyond categorization to understand affective influences on real world health decisions.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Erin M Ellis
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2019-11-25

4.  Affect and Social Judgment: The Roles of Physiological Reactivity and Interoceptive Sensitivity.

Authors:  Mallory J Feldman; Erika Siegel; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Karen S Quigley; Jolie B Wormwood
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  The pleasantness of visual symmetry: always, never or sometimes.

Authors:  Anna Pecchinenda; Marco Bertamini; Alexis David James Makin; Nicole Ruta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Why Is 10 Past 10 the Default Setting for Clocks and Watches in Advertisements? A Psychological Experiment.

Authors:  Ahmed A Karim; Britta Lützenkirchen; Eman Khedr; Radwa Khalil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-23

7.  A Double Dissociation between Conscious and Non-conscious Priming of Responses and Affect: Evidence for a Contribution of Misattributions to the Priming of Affect.

Authors:  Florian Goller; Shah Khalid; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-27

8.  New methods for assessing the fascinating nature of nature experiences.

Authors:  Yannick Joye; Roos Pals; Linda Steg; Ben Lewis Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Watch the target! Effects in the affective misattribution procedure become weaker (but not eliminated) when participants are motivated to provide accurate responses to the target.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; Roland Deutsch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-24

10.  How Do Induced Affective States Bias Emotional Contagion to Faces? A Three-Dimensional Model.

Authors:  Andrés Pinilla; Ricardo M Tamayo; Jorge Neira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.