Literature DB >> 20837097

Prediction markets and their potential role in biomedical research--a review.

Thomas Pfeiffer1, Johan Almenberg.   

Abstract

Predictions markets are marketplaces for trading contracts with payoffs that depend on the outcome of future events. Popular examples are markets on the outcome of presidential elections, where contracts pay $1 if a specific candidate wins the election and $0 if someone else wins. Contract prices on prediction markets can be interpreted as forecasts regarding the outcome of future events. Further attractive properties include the potential to aggregate private information, to generate and disseminate a consensus among the market participants, and to offer incentives for the acquisition of information. It has been argued that these properties might be valuable in the context of scientific research. In this review, we give an overview of key properties of prediction markets and discuss potential benefits for science. To illustrate these benefits for biomedical research, we discuss an example application in the context of decision making in research on the genetics of diseases. Moreover, some potential practical problems of prediction market application in science are discussed, and solutions are outlined.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20837097     DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  3 in total

1.  Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Stefan M Herzog; Ralph Hertwig; Jens Krause; Patricia A Carney; Andy Bogart; Giuseppe Argenziano; Iris Zalaudek; Max Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Self-organized flexible leadership promotes collective intelligence in human groups.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Max Wolf; Marc Naguib; Jens Krause
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Evaluating New Ways of Working Collectively in Science with a Focus on Crowdsourcing.

Authors:  Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Karl Mattingly
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 8.143

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.