Rachel Sokal1. 1. NHS Nottinghamshire County, Nottinghamshire, UK. rachel.sokal@nhs.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To consider the recent evidence which examines factors that are associated with uptake of cervical and breast screening in the British South Asian community and to consider the effectiveness of interventions to improve uptake in this group. METHODS: A search strategy was developed and key databases were searched to identify primary research studies that examined the uptake of cervical and breast screening in British women of South Asian origin. Studies published prior to 1996 were excluded from the review. RESULTS: Seventy-eight studies were identified and ten were included in the review. Observational studies demonstrated mixed results on the effect of ethnicity on uptake of screening. Controlling for confounders attenuated the effect in all studies and removed its effect entirely in some. Investigation of low uptake in qualitative and quantitative research indicates that South Asian women were more likely to have incorrect addresses and language or cultural barriers to screening than other women. Few interventional studies were identified and all varied in their design. The success of interventions was mixed and the lack of control groups in some studies made it difficult to draw conclusions on their effectiveness. CONCLUSION: There is a poor uptake of cervical and breast screening by South Asian women compared with the general population in Britain. Evidence is inconclusive as to whether this is due to a residual effect of ethnicity following control for socio-demographic and local health service variables. Currently there is a lack of robust experimental studies on which to base interventions intended to increase uptake in this population.
OBJECTIVES: To consider the recent evidence which examines factors that are associated with uptake of cervical and breast screening in the British South Asian community and to consider the effectiveness of interventions to improve uptake in this group. METHODS: A search strategy was developed and key databases were searched to identify primary research studies that examined the uptake of cervical and breast screening in British women of South Asian origin. Studies published prior to 1996 were excluded from the review. RESULTS: Seventy-eight studies were identified and ten were included in the review. Observational studies demonstrated mixed results on the effect of ethnicity on uptake of screening. Controlling for confounders attenuated the effect in all studies and removed its effect entirely in some. Investigation of low uptake in qualitative and quantitative research indicates that South Asian women were more likely to have incorrect addresses and language or cultural barriers to screening than other women. Few interventional studies were identified and all varied in their design. The success of interventions was mixed and the lack of control groups in some studies made it difficult to draw conclusions on their effectiveness. CONCLUSION: There is a poor uptake of cervical and breast screening by South Asian women compared with the general population in Britain. Evidence is inconclusive as to whether this is due to a residual effect of ethnicity following control for socio-demographic and local health service variables. Currently there is a lack of robust experimental studies on which to base interventions intended to increase uptake in this population.
Authors: Rebecca J Schwei; Sam Del Pozo; Niels Agger-Gupta; Wilma Alvarado-Little; Ann Bagchi; Alice Hm Chen; Lisa Diamond; Francesca Gany; Doreena Wong; Elizabeth A Jacobs Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Sameena Azhar; Laura C Wyatt; Vaidehi Jokhakar; Shilpa Patel; Victoria H Raveis; Simona C Kwon; Nadia S Islam Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Christine Ekechi; Adeola Olaitan; Rosie Ellis; Jacob Koris; Adaugo Amajuoyi; Laura Av Marlow Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rachel Mary Anderson de Cuevas; Pooja Saini; Deborah Roberts; Kinta Beaver; Mysore Chandrashekar; Anil Jain; Eleanor Kotas; Naheed Tahir; Saiqa Ahmed; Stephen L Brown Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Victoria G Woof; Helen Ruane; David P French; Fiona Ulph; Nadeem Qureshi; Nasaim Khan; D Gareth Evans; Louise S Donnelly Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: D Gareth Evans; Adam R Brentnall; Michelle Harvie; Susan Astley; Elaine F Harkness; Paula Stavrinos; Louise S Donnelly; Sarah Sampson; Faiza Idries; Donna Watterson; Jack Cuzick; Mary Wilson; Anil Jain; Fiona Harrison; Anthony J Maxwell; Anthony Howell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.295