Literature DB >> 20835895

Revision to malabsorptive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (MRNYGBP) provides long-term (10 years) durable weight loss in patients with failed anatomically intact gastric restrictive operations: long-term effectiveness of a malabsorptive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in salvaging patients with poor weight loss or complications following gastroplasty and adjustable gastric bands.

Myur Srinivasan Srikanth1, Ki Hyun Oh, Samuel Ross Fox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of gastric restrictive operations require revision. Conversion to Proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRNYGBP) is associated with weight regain. Forty-one percent of these fail to achieve a body mass index (BMI) < 35. Few report follow-up (F/U) or quality of life (QOL) beyond 5 years. We report the long-term effectiveness of MRNYGBP as a revision.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients (1993-2005) with a failed gastric restrictive operation (S1) at least a year out from revision (S2) to a MRNYGBP: small lesser curve 22 ± 10 (11-55) cm(3) pouch, long biliopancreatic limb, 150 cm alimentary limb, 141 ± 24 (102-190) cm common channel. Staple-line disruptions were excluded.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight (37 F, 1 M) patients aged 46 ± 8 (17-56) years underwent conversion to a MRYGBP 8 ± 5 (2-23) years after: gastroplasty 25, adjustable gastric band 13 for weight regain (79%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; 29%), and band problems (24%). S1 provided only 24 ± 25% excess weight loss (EWL; 5.9 ± 6.3 BMI drop) and caused GERD in 32% of patients (p = 0.0124). There were no deaths or leaks. BMI dropped from 41.4 ± 7.8 to 27.3 ± 5.6 (down 20.5 ± 8.3 from S1), 80.1 ± 23.3% EWL (n = 32) at year 1 (p < 0.0001). This was maintained for 10 years. BMI was 28 ± 4 (21.5-31.9), 75.6 ± 21.1% EWL (57.3-109.6) (n = 5) at 10 years. Super obese patients had better 9.95% EWL after S2 (p = 0.0359). QOL (5 = excellent): 4.5 ± 0.5 (3-5). F/U: 5.1 ± 3.3 (1-13) years with 83.3% F/U 10-year rate. Labs at 3 years (n = 10): Alb 3.8 ± 0.4, Prot 6.8 ± 0.6, Iron 47.6 ± 33.3, VitD 15.1 ± 7.43, PTH 54.5 ± 27.2, B12 620.1 ± 676.5, Hct 34 ± 4.3.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision MRNYGBP provides excellent durable long-term weight loss after failed gastric restrictive operations. Non-compliant patients are at a higher risk for malnutrition, anemia, and osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20835895     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-010-0280-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  24 in total

1.  Revisional bariatric surgery--safe and effective.

Authors:  K B Jones
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Revision of failed gastric bypass to distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 65 cases.

Authors:  M A Fobi; H Lee; D Igwe; B Felahy; E James; M Stanczyk; J Tambi; P Eyong
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Duodenal switch is a safe operation for patients who have failed other bariatric operations.

Authors:  Ara Keshishian; Karin Zahriya; Teny Hartoonian; Chris Ayagian
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years.

Authors:  Nicolas V Christou; Didier Look; Lloyd D Maclean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Revision of the duodenal switch: indications, technique, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nahid Hamoui; Brandon Chock; Gary J Anthone; Peter F Crookes
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients.

Authors:  Philippe Mognol; Denis Chosidow; Jean-Pierre Marmuse
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; Oscar R Beltran; Plamen Slavchev; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A case-match analysis of failed prior bariatric procedures converted to resectional gastric bypass.

Authors:  Matthew J Martin; Philip S Mullenix; Scott R Steele; Craig S See; Daniel G Cuadrado; Preston L Carter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Unsatisfactory weight loss after vertical banded gastroplasty: is conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass successful?

Authors:  Fernando Cordera; Jane L Mai; Geoffrey B Thompson; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty (Mason MacLean) into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Antonio Iannelli; Daniela Amato; Pietro Addeo; Massimo Senni Buratti; Moucef Damhan; Imed Ben Amor; Eric Sejor; Enrico Facchiano; Jean Gugenheim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  11 in total

1.  Oral Vitamin B12 Supplementation After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; Alastair Reid; Yitka Graham; Lindes Callejas-Diaz; Chetan Parmar; William Rj Carr; Neil Jennings; Rishi Singhal; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Revision Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Biliopancreatic Long-Limb Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Weight Response: Case Series and Analysis.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Danette M Oien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Revision of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Limb Distalization for Inadequate Weight Loss or Weight Regain.

Authors:  Reuben D Shin; Michael B Goldberg; Allison S Shafran; Samuel A Shikora; Melissa C Majumdar; Scott A Shikora
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Revisional metabolic/bariatric surgery: a moral obligation.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Long-term follow-up evaluation of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Alexander Perathoner; Matthias Zitt; Monika Lanthaler; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl; Reinhard Mittermair
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Revision of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Weight Regain: a Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel D Tran; Ifeanyi D Nwokeabia; Stephanie Purnell; Syed Nabeel Zafar; Gezzer Ortega; Kakra Hughes; Terrence M Fullum
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Gastroesophageal reflux after vertical banded gastroplasty is alleviated by conversion to gastric bypass.

Authors:  M Ekelund; S Oberg; R Peterli; S G Frederiksen; J L Hedenbro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Luigi Angrisani; Antonio Vitiello; Antonella Santonicola; Ariola Hasani; Maurizio De Luca; Paola Iovino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term follow-up and technical considerations.

Authors:  M W Hii; A C Lake; C Kenfield; G H Hopkins
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Revision of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Weight Loss or Weight Regain.

Authors:  Andreas Alexandrou; Panagiotis Sakarellos; Spyridon Davakis; Michail Vailas; Nikoletta Dimitriou; Alexandros Papalampros; Dimitrios Schizas; Alexandros Charalabopoulos; Evangelos Felekouras
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.