| Literature DB >> 20835746 |
Marte Karoline Råberg Kjøllesdal1, Victoria Telle Hjellset, Benedikte Bjørge, Gerd Holmboe-Ottesen, Margareta Wandel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore food perceptions in terms of health among Pakistani immigrant women, and if such perceptions could be altered through a culturally adapted intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20835746 PMCID: PMC3174368 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-010-0191-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Public Health ISSN: 1661-8556 Impact factor: 3.380
Description of 198 Norwegian-Pakistani women participating in a culturally adapted intervention in Oslo, 2006–2008 (baseline data)
| Intervention ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 41 (8.0) | 42 (8.2) |
| Years in Norway, mean (SD) | 18 (7.9) | 19 (7.6) |
| Command of Norwegian | ||
| (Quite) poor (%) | 48.5 | 41.7 |
| (Very) good (%) | 51.5 | 58.3 |
| Education (years) mean (SD) | 9 (4.7) | 9 (4.3) |
| Number of children born, mean (SD) | 3.6 (0.2) | 3.3 (0.2) |
| BMI, mean (SD) | 29.4 (5.6) | 29.8 (5.5) |
| Overweight (BMI ≥ 25) (%) | 76.2 | 83.5 |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 30) (%) | 38.6 | 40.2 |
| High-risk South Asians (BMI ≥ 27.5) (%)a | 59.4 | 62.9 |
| T2D (%) | 13.9 | 12.4 |
Difference between groups is non-significant for all variables
aIndicating high risk for T2D and cardiovascular disease for South Asians (Deurenberg-Yap et al. 2000)
Fig. 1Foods and nutrients emphasised as ‘good for the body’/healthy at baseline (intervention and control group). The women were asked to mention as many foods as they could think of. No significant differences between the groups. Data from a culturally adapted intervention among Norwegian-Pakistani women in Oslo, 2006–2008
Fig. 2Foods that the Pakistani women perceived should be eaten in limited amounts/unhealthy at baseline (intervention and control group). The women were asked to mention as many foods as they could think of. No significant differences between the groups. Data from a culturally adapted intervention among Norwegian-Pakistani women in Oslo, 2006–2008
Fig. 3Proportion of women mentioning different information sources about healthy eating at baseline (intervention and control group). Data from a culturally adapted intervention among Norwegian-Pakistani women in Oslo, 2006–2008
The odds ratio (OR) for emphasising food items as ‘good for the body’ or ‘something that should be eaten in limited amounts’ when having different sources of information
| Emphasis | Limitation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salad | Chicken | Meat | Sugar | White rice | Hard fat | Fat in general | (Deep) fried foods | |
| Mother | 0.36 (0.16 0.80)* | 6.39 (2.10 19.43)** | ||||||
| Other women | 0.43 (0.19 0.97)* | |||||||
| School | 2.47 (1.18 5.18)* | 2.80 (1.46 5.38)** | ||||||
| Doctor/health personnel | 4.33 (1.37 13.64)* | |||||||
| Public health information | 4.90 (1.31 18.30)* | |||||||
| Husband, family | 3.21 (1.16 8.91)* | |||||||
| TV | 3.50 (1.15 10.69)* | |||||||
Results are from logistic regressions of intervention and control group at baseline. The values are expressed as OR (95% CI). Only food items with significant relationships to sources of information mentioned. Data from a culturally adapted intervention among Norwegian-Pakistani women in Oslo, 2006–2008
CI confidence interval
* p value < 0.05; ** p value < 0.01 for comparison with not mentioning food item
Proportions at baseline and follow-up emphasising food items as ‘good for the body’ or ‘something that should be eaten in limited amounts’
| Baseline (%) | Follow-up (%) | Change within intervention groupa
| Difference at follow-upb
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | |||
| Emphasis | ||||||
| Salad/raw vegetables | 20.0 | 18.3 | 36.3 | 17.3 | 0.014 | |
| Meat | 16.7 | 9.7 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 0.039 | |
| Limitation | ||||||
| Sugar | 65.3 | 67.0 | 83.8 | 80.8 | 0.021 | |
| White flour | 27.6 | 24.5 | 50.0 | 27.4 | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| White ricec | 21.4 | 12.8 | 32.5 | 17.8 | ||
Only items with a significant change or difference at follow-up are shown. There were no significant changes from baseline to follow-up in the control group. Data are from a culturally adapted intervention among Norwegian-Pakistani women in Oslo, 2006–2008
aMcNemar test for change from baseline to follow-up within intervention group
b χ 2 statistics for difference between intervention and control groups at follow-up
c χ 2 statistics for difference in change from baseline to follow-up between the groups, p = 0.030