Literature DB >> 20835721

Preoperative ultrasound measurements predict the feasibility of gallbladder extraction during transgastric natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy.

Byron F Santos1, Edward D Auyang, Eric S Hungness, Kush R Desai, Edward S Chan, Darren B van Beek, Edward C Wang, Nathaniel J Soper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extraction of a gallbladder through an endoscopic overtube during natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transgastric cholecystectomy avoids potential injury to the esophagus. This study examined the rate of successful gallbladder specimen extraction through an overtube and hypothesized that preoperative ultrasound findings could predict successful specimen passage.
METHODS: Gallbladder specimens from patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were measured, and an attempt was made to pull the specimens through a commercially available overtube with an inner diameter of 16.7-mm. A radiologist blinded to the outcomes reviewed the available preoperative ultrasound measurements from these patients. Ultrasound dimensions including gallbladder length, width, and depth; wall thickness; common bile duct diameter; and size of the largest gallstone (LGS) were recorded. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether ultrasound findings and patient characteristics (age, body mass index [BMI], and sex) could predict the ability of a specimen to pass through the overtube.
RESULTS: Of 57 patients, 44 (77%) who had preoperative ultrasounds available for electronic review were included in the final analysis. Gallstones were present in 35 (79%) of these 44 patients. Intraoperative gallbladder perforation occurred in 18 (41%) of the 44 patients, and 16 (36%) of the 44 gallbladders could be extracted through the overtube. Measurement of LGS was possible for 23 patients, and indeterminate gallstone size (IGS) was determined for 12 patients. The rate for passage of perforated versus intact gallbladders was similar (40% vs. 23%; p = 0.054). The LGS (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.33; p = 0.021) and IGS (OR, 22.97; 95% CI, 1.99-265.63; p = 0.025) predicted failed passage on multivariate logistic regression analysis. The passage rate was 80% for LGS smaller than 10 mm or no stones present, 18% for LGS 10 mm or larger, and 8% for IGS (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: A majority of cholecystectomy specimens cannot pass through an endoscopic overtube. Preoperative ultrasound findings can predict successful specimen extraction. An IGS or a gallstone 10 mm or larger should be considered a relative contraindication to transgastric NOTES cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20835721     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1334-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Surgeon perceptions of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Eric T Volckmann; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: report of 3 cases.

Authors:  Paolo Rossi; Walter Bugiantella; Luigina Graziosi; Emanuel Cavazzoni; Annibale Donini
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting.

Authors:  Eliana Della Flora; Thomas G Wilson; Ian J Martin; Nicholas A O'Rourke; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Upper GI foreign body: an adult urban emergency hospital experience.

Authors:  W C Conway; C Sugawa; H Ono; C E Lucas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Eric Volckmann; Eric Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in human beings: preliminary results.

Authors:  Antonello Forgione; Dario Maggioni; Fabio Sansonna; Carlo Ferrari; Stefano Di Lernia; Davide Citterio; Carmelo Magistro; Luigi Frigerio; Raffaele Pugliese
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Hybrid NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: operative and long-term results after 18 cases.

Authors:  Raffaele Pugliese; Antonello Forgione; Fabio Sansonna; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Stefano Di Lernia; Carmelo Magistro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, and minilaparoscopy: analysis of a prospective clinical series.

Authors:  José Noguera; Carlos Dolz; Angel Cuadrado; José Olea; Angels Vilella; Rafael Morales
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transvaginal cholecystectomy without abdominal ports.

Authors:  Fausto Davila; Daniel A Tsin; Guillermo Dominguez; Ulises Davila; Ramiro Jesús; Adriana Gomez de Arteche
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery.

Authors:  Daniel A Tsin; Liliana T Colombero; Johann Lambeck; Panagiotis Manolas
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Huge gallstone complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Adonye Banigo
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-25

3.  Risk factors for gallbladder contractility after cholecystolithotomy in elderly high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Hao Luo; Hong-Tao Yan; Guo-Hu Zhang; Wei-Hui Liu; Li-Jun Tang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for giant gall stone: Report of two cases.

Authors:  P O Igwe; O N Diri
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.