OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a locally applied 8.5% nanostructured doxycycline (DOX) gel in preventing alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontal disease (EPD) in rats by using the tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: EPD was induced in 24 Wistar rats. Animals were treated with the doxycycline gel topically, immediately after EPD induction, and 3 times a day during 11 days. Four groups (n=6) were formed as follows: Naïve group (animals not subjected to EPD nor treated); non-treated (NT) group (animals subjected to EPD, but not treated); vehicle gel (VG) group (animals subjected to EPD and treated with topical gel vehicle); and DOX group (test group): animals subjected to EPD and treated with the 8.5% DOX gel. In order to investigate topographical changes in histological sections, a novel simple method was used for sample preparation, by etching sections from paraffin-embedded specimens with xylol. RESULTS: Comparing the AFM images, several grooves were observed on the surface of the alveolar bone and other periodontal structures in the NT and VG groups, with significantly greater depths when compared to the DOX group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal structures were brought into high relief confirming to be a simple and cost-effective method for AFM imaging with ultrastructural resolution. The doxycycline gel was able to afford periodontal surface preservation, with flatter grooves.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a locally applied 8.5% nanostructured doxycycline (DOX) gel in preventing alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontal disease (EPD) in rats by using the tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM). MATERIAL AND METHODS:EPD was induced in 24 Wistar rats. Animals were treated with the doxycycline gel topically, immediately after EPD induction, and 3 times a day during 11 days. Four groups (n=6) were formed as follows: Naïve group (animals not subjected to EPD nor treated); non-treated (NT) group (animals subjected to EPD, but not treated); vehicle gel (VG) group (animals subjected to EPD and treated with topical gel vehicle); and DOX group (test group): animals subjected to EPD and treated with the 8.5% DOX gel. In order to investigate topographical changes in histological sections, a novel simple method was used for sample preparation, by etching sections from paraffin-embedded specimens with xylol. RESULTS: Comparing the AFM images, several grooves were observed on the surface of the alveolar bone and other periodontal structures in the NT and VG groups, with significantly greater depths when compared to the DOX group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal structures were brought into high relief confirming to be a simple and cost-effective method for AFM imaging with ultrastructural resolution. The doxycycline gel was able to afford periodontal surface preservation, with flatter grooves.
Several methods have been employed in dentistry to better understand periodontal disease
process[5]. The induction of
periodontal disease by ligature placement is widely used in animal studies[1-4,7,8].
However, as criticism of this model still remains, other methods are necessary for a
better understanding of the pathogenesis of periodontal disease.Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a very powerful tool as common technique for biological
imaging, from molecule to cell morphology or even ultrastructural changes on tissue,
where nanometric details are required to investigate the surface of the specimen. AFM is
commonly used in examining biological specimens since it works well without any need for
staining or coating[5,17].Periodontal structures, such as the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone, play an
important role not only in maintaining structural integrity, but also in determining
tissue function. Alveolar bone and attachment loss due to periodontal diseases, for
example, is directly associated with the presence of dental biofilm and poor oral
hygiene[4,6,9].In general lines, the pathogenesis of periodontitis involves the continuous presence of
an irritating factor (e.g.: bacterial byproducts) that may initiate a local inflammatory
reaction in predisposed hosts[7].
Insight into pathological structure function relationships depends on an accurate
identification of ultrastructural changes on periodontal structures since the
progression of periodontitis is considered a relevant cause of tooth loss in adults.
Periodontitis is as a chronic inflammatory disease that affects a major part of world’s
population characterized by localized or generalized bone resorption[8].Periodontal disease is also associated with the heart diseases. Different therapies are
available to treat this pathology using nanotechnology for microencapsulating thymol,
carvacrol and other natural flavonoids that produce antiinflammatory and antimicrobial
effects during this inflammatory processes[8-10,21]. The host’s inflammatory response leads to edema, and
the release of inflammatory mediators, causing periodontal pocket formation, loss of
connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone resorption, ultimately leading to tooth
loss[4,6,9].It is difficult to establish the periodontal status without periodontal tissue integrity
conditions. The main difficulty seems to be greater when a three-dimensional evaluation
is required[11,17]. The third dimension is important for the comprehensive
understanding of tissue ultrastructure. The inclusion of topographical and roughness
surface aspects might increase the prediction of periodontal therapy
evaluation[22].As no experimental studies have investigated the possibility of using AFM to evaluate
the integrity of periodontal components, clarification of the contributions of this
technique on ultrastructural changes in the periodontal structures would be useful. The
aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a locally applied 8.5% nanostructured
doxycycline (DOX) gel in preventing alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontal
disease (ePD) in rats by using a previously described tapping mode AFM
technique[5].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Twenty-four male Wistar rats from the same nest (similar age; weight: 160-200 g) from
our own animal facilities were housed in temperaturecontrolled rooms and received
water and food ad libitum. The rats were randomly assigned to test
and control groups using blocked randomization from a computer-generated list. All
experiments were conducted in accordance with the local guidelines on the welfare of
experimental animals and with the approval of the Committee of ethics in Animal
Research of the Federal University of Ceará.
Gel preparation
The doxycycline gel containing nanospheres was prepared at the Biotechnology
Laboratory of evidence Pharmaceuticals, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of
Ceará, Brazil, and kept in the dark to avoid any interference of light. For
preparation of the 8.5% nanostructured doxycycline (w/w) (Merck Chemicals Ltd.
Beeston, Nottingham, england) gel, Carbopol-94O (BF Goodrich Co., Cleveland, OH, USA)
2% (w/v) was used by mechanical dispersion in distilled water under vigorous
agitation and polisorbate 80 was used, being neutralized until pH 6.0 with
trietanolamine.The nanostructured gel was prepared by the combination of two techniques as a Patent
Application at National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). The gel was stored
in white polyethylene containers kept hermetically sealed under refrigeration at 8°C
until used.Stability study to evaluate the consistency of the gel over a period of 2 months was
conducted by keeping the formulation at different conditions (4°C, 37°C and room
temperature) and measuring the viscosity of the gel formulation at regular intervals.
The viscosity was measured by a Brooke-field synchrolectric viscometer. The TD bar
spindle of LV series was employed for the measurement. The study indicated that the
viscosity of the carbopol gel did not change significantly throughout the stability
period in the specified conditions.
Induction of EPD
A sterile nylon (000) thread ligature (Point Suture do Brasil
Indústria de Fios Cirúrgicos Ltda. Fortaleza,Ce-Brazil) was
placed around the cervix of the second left upper molar of rats anesthetized with 10%
chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, i.p.), as described elsewhere[5]. The ligature was knotted on the buccal side of the
tooth, resulting in subgingival position palatally and in supragingival position
buccally. The contralateral right side was used as the unligated control animals were
weighed daily.
Drug Treatments
Four groups of 6 animals each were formed as follows: Naïve group (animals not
subjected to ePD nor treated); non-treated (NT) group (animals subjected to ePD, but
not treated); vehicle gel (VG) group (animals subjected to ePD and treated with
topical gel vehicle); and DOX group (test group): animals subjected to ePD and
treated with the 8.5% DOX gel (Dental Gel®; evidence
Pharmaceuticals LTD., Fortaleza, Ce, Brazil). The topical treatment with the gel was
performed applying 1 g of the product on the ligated sites immediately after the
surgical procedure and 3 times a day, until the sacrifice at the 11th
day.
Measurements of Alveolar Bone Loss
The animals were sacrificed on the 11th day of periodontitis induction,
and had their maxillae excised and fixed in 10% neutral formalin. Both maxillary
halves were then defleshed and stained with 1% aqueous methylene blue in order to
distinguish bone from teeth. The horizontal alveolar bone loss, the distance between
the cusp tip and the alveolar bone, were measured using the method described by
Botelho[5] (2009).To confirm these findings another digitalized technique was performed with the ImageJ
(Research Services Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland,
USA). A public domain Java image processing program were the area was determined not
only in linear terms but also in square millimeters (mm2)as well. The
measurement of alveolar bone loss was done by a blind examiner (M.A.B.) for both
groups. The processing program calculated the area in pixels values, than statistics
was applied in defined selections areas (distances and angles) in each periodontal
area. The spatial calibration was performed in the photograph with a regular
millimeter paper to provide real world dimensional measurements in units such as
millimeters.
Histopathological Analysis
After sacrifice by anesthetic overdose, animals had their maxillae excised. The
specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and demineralized in 7% nitric
acid. These specimens were then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned along
the molars in a mesiodistal plane, for hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Sixmillimeter-thick sections, which included the roots of the first and second
molars, were utilized. The areas between the first and second molars, where the
ligature was placed, were analyzed under light microscopy using a four-point (0-3)
scoring system, considering the inflammatory cell influx, and alveolar bone and
cementum integrity, as described previously[4,5]: Score "0" (zero):
absence or only mild cellular infiltration (inflammatory cell infiltration is sparse
and restricted to the region of the marginal gingiva), preserved alveolar process and
cementum. Score 1: moderate cellular infiltration (inflammatory cells present all
over the attached gingiva), little alveolar bone resorption and intact cementum.
Score 2: intense cellular infiltration (inflammatory cells present in both gingival
and periodontal ligament), accentuated degradation of the alveolar process, and
partial destruction of cementum. Score 3: severe cellular infiltrate, complete
resorption of the alveolar process, and severe destruction of cementum. The
histopathological analysis was performed by a blind examiner (M.A.B.) in all
groups.
Histological sample preparation for AFM images
After routine histological sample preparation, chemical etching with 1% xylol was
done, providing of semi thin sections from paraffin-embedded specimens to melt the
upper layers, removing the superficial roughness caused by the edge of the microtome
knife and bringing into high relief the biological structures hidden in the bulk.
Fivemillimeter-thick sections, which included the roots of the first and second
molars, were used. The areas between the first and second molars, where the ligature
was placed, were analyzed using taping mode AFM. The samples were prepared and the
aspects of its topography and ultrastructural changes were analyzed.To obtain AFM height data, samples of rat maxilla were scanned in air with a
Nanoscope IIIa Multimode AFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) by tapping
mode at a scan of about 0.400 Hz, resonance frequencies of ca. 200 to 380 kHz, with
crystal silicon cantilevers (Digital Instruments) at spring constant of approximately
40 N/m, and tip radius of 15 nm. The scan sizes performed were 30x30 µm. AFM
scan controls were properly adjusted (sufficient contact force, and high gains) to
avoid tip artifacts during the scanning of the samples. To 3D-visualization the
height data were processed with Nanoscope software (Digital Instruments), version
5.12 r3. We used Nanoscope software to calculate the surface roughness for the
periodontium regions AFM height data with scan size of 30x30 µm. Thirty
regions per sample were randomly chosen to determine the mean surface roughness
(Ra)[17,22], and the topographical changes
independent analysis were performed by a blind examiner (M.A.B.) for both tested
groups.
Statistical Analysis
The data are presented as the mean ± SeM or as the medians, where appropriate.
A univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s test was used to
compare means, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare medians. A probability
value of P <0.05 was considered to indicate significant
differences. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Analysis
was performed with Graph Pad Prisma Version 3.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc. San
Diego, CA, USA).
RESULTS
Effect of DOX gel on the alveolar bone loss
Macroscopically, the treatment of animals subjected to 11 days of experimental
periodontal disease with the DOX gel reduced the alveolar bone loss. These changes
reached statistical significance (P<0.05), as compared to the untreated animals
subjected to ePD and those treated with vehicle gel (Figure 1). These data can be clearly seen in Figure 2a, which shows the macroscopic aspects of the contra
lateral right side (unligated side) with no resorption of the alveolar bone, compared
to the severe bone resorption with root exposure in the untreated group (NT) and VG
group (V) (Figure 2b and Figure 2c).
Figure 1
Macroscopic aspects of the effect of a nanostructured 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX)
locally applied gel (Dental gel®) on alveolar bone loss.
Experimental periodontal disease was also induced in the animals from the
Non-Treated (NT) and in vehicle (V) groups. Naïve group was not
submitted to EPD and received no treatment. Bars represent the mean ±
Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of alveolar bone loss (mm; N=6). Asterisk
indicates a statistically significant difference between the DOX group and NT
group (*P<0.05; Bonferroni, ANOVA)
Figure 2
Macroscopic aspects of the effect of c on experimental periodontal disease in
rats. A: macroscopic aspect of a normal periodontium of rat maxillae showing
healthy periodontal structures; B and C: periodontium of rats subjected to
induction of experimental periodontitis with no treatment (NT) and vehicle gel
treatment, showing severe alveolar bone loss
Macroscopic aspects of the effect of a nanostructured 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX)
locally applied gel (Dental gel®) on alveolar bone loss.
Experimental periodontal disease was also induced in the animals from the
Non-Treated (NT) and in vehicle (V) groups. Naïve group was not
submitted to EPD and received no treatment. Bars represent the mean ±
Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of alveolar bone loss (mm; N=6). Asterisk
indicates a statistically significant difference between the DOX group and NT
group (*P<0.05; Bonferroni, ANOVA)Macroscopic aspects of the effect of c on experimental periodontal disease in
rats. A: macroscopic aspect of a normal periodontium of rat maxillae showing
healthy periodontal structures; B and C: periodontium of rats subjected to
induction of experimental periodontitis with no treatment (NT) and vehicle gel
treatment, showing severe alveolar bone loss
Effect of DOX gel on the myeloperoxidase activity on rat gingiva
Figure 3 shows a reduction of inflammatory cell
infiltration found in the periodontium tissue of animals subjected to experimental
periodontitis and treated with the DOX gel. The neutrophil infiltration was evaluated
by the myeloperoxidase activity in the gingival tissue. It was observed a significant
(P<0.05) decrease in the myeloperoxidase activity in the
gingival tissue only in the DOX group as compared to the rats treated with vehicle
gel.
Figure 3
Effect of 8.5% DOX gel on myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in the maxillary
gingival tissue of rats submitted to experimental periodontal disease (EPD).
Vehicle (V) gel and Doxycycline (DOX) gel were administered topically in
animals subjected to EPD induction. EPD was induced also in Non-Treated (NT)
animals and Naïve group received no treatment and was not submitted to
EPD induction. Bars represent mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of the
activity of MPO/mg of tissue. *P<0.05 was considered significantly different
compared to NT group (ANOVA; Bonferroni’s test)
Effect of 8.5% DOX gel on myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in the maxillary
gingival tissue of rats submitted to experimental periodontal disease (EPD).
Vehicle (V) gel and Doxycycline (DOX) gel were administered topically in
animals subjected to EPD induction. EPD was induced also in Non-Treated (NT)
animals and Naïve group received no treatment and was not submitted to
EPD induction. Bars represent mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of the
activity of MPO/mg of tissue. *P<0.05 was considered significantly different
compared to NT group (ANOVA; Bonferroni’s test)
Effect of DOX gel on the periodontal structures
The alveolar bone surface morphology of the DOX group was less altered compared with
the vehicle gel group. The AFM image of the DOX group (Figure 4) shows a regular surface covered with a shallow defined layer.
The height of this layer varied between 150 and 250 nm, while the NT group and the VG
group varied between 750 and 950 nm (Figure
5).
Figure 4
Effect of 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX) gel on alveolar bone surface roughness in rats
subjected to experimental periodontal disease (EPD). The AFM image from the DOX
group shows a regular bone surface covered with a shallow defined layer
Figure 5
Chosen areas to evaluate the topographical changes in alveolar bone of rats
subjected to the experimental periodontitis disease EPD treated with vehicle
gel
Effect of 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX) gel on alveolar bone surface roughness in rats
subjected to experimental periodontal disease (EPD). The AFM image from the DOX
group shows a regular bone surface covered with a shallow defined layerChosen areas to evaluate the topographical changes in alveolar bone of rats
subjected to the experimental periodontitis diseaseEPD treated with vehicle
gelAfter 11 days of treatment with the DOX gel, the AFM images showed alterations
compared with the V and NT group images (Figure
6). The depths of the grooves on the DOX group were 30-120 nm and their
width ranged from 100 to 250 nm. After 11 days of periodontal challenge, the VG and
NT groups presented grooves becoming more irregular than the DOX-treated grooves.
These alterations were found in all of the six examined areas of all 6 specimens.
Figure 6
Effect of 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX) gel on the alveolar bone loss in alveolar bone
roughness analysis by AFM in rats with experimental periodontal disease (EPD).
The 8.5% DOX gel was administered topically, daily, in animals subjected to the
EPD. Bars represent the mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of alveolar
bone loss (mm; N=6). Asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference
between treated group and Non-Treated (NT) group (*P<0.05; Bonferroni,
ANOVA)
Effect of 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX) gel on the alveolar bone loss in alveolar bone
roughness analysis by AFM in rats with experimental periodontal disease (EPD).
The 8.5% DOX gel was administered topically, daily, in animals subjected to the
EPD. Bars represent the mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) of alveolar
bone loss (mm; N=6). Asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference
between treated group and Non-Treated (NT) group (*P<0.05; Bonferroni,
ANOVA)These data can be clearly seen in Figure 7,
which shows the topographical aspects by section analysis of the alveolar bone of the
rat maxillae with less resorption, and maintenance the integrity of the periodontal
ligament, when compared to the severe topographical alterations caused in the NT
group and vehicle gel treated group. Figure 8
shows the section analysis in bone surface on animals subjected to ePD and treated
with the DOX gel.
Figure 7
Topographical changes in alveolar bone surface of rats subjected to
experimental periodontitis disease EPD and treated with 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX)
gel
Figure 8
Topographical changes in alveolar bone surface of rats subjected to
experimental periodontitis disease EPD treated with the vehicle gel
Topographical changes in alveolar bone surface of rats subjected to
experimental periodontitis diseaseEPD and treated with 8.5% Doxycycline (DOX)
gelTopographical changes in alveolar bone surface of rats subjected to
experimental periodontitis diseaseEPD treated with the vehicle gel
Effect of DOX gel on the periodontal ligament
The AFM analysis of the region between the first and second molars shows
topographical alterations of the periodontium of the animals subjected to
periodontitis that received VG group revealed a intense topographical alterations
with deeper grooves and valleys on its structures surfaces with cementum destruction
and complete alveolar process resorption (Figure
8), whereas a reduction of inflammatory cell infiltration and a partial
preservation of the cementum and of the alveolar process was found in the
periodontium of animals subjected to ePD and treated with the DOX gel, the deep
grooves values were statistically significant (P<0.05), when compared to the NT
and VG groups.The AFM images of periodontium treated with the DOX gel showed morphological
differences compared to the AFM images of the NT and VG groups. Moreover, the AFM
images of the cementum treated with DOX gel was also different from images of the NT
group.Figure 5 shows how the AFM surface roughness
analysis was made to establish the width of alveolar bone grooves after 11 days of
treatment with the vehicle gel and the DOX gel. The surface of the Naïve and
DOX groups seems relatively regular, with higher coefficients of roughness surface,
in other hand, vehicle (V) and EPD groups presented greater alveolar bone resorption
with much less roughness at the evaluated sites (Figure 6). Comparing the AFM surface roughness analysis, it can be stated
that the periodontal structures in the DOX and Naïve groups seemed rougher
when compared to the NT and VG groups. The mean depth of the groove in the DOX group
varied between 90 and 350 nm and the width ranged from 1.0 to 1.5 μm. As the same
results were obtained in all of the five examined areas for each specimen, the
morphology in DOX group represents the typical surface morphology seen in the
cementum treated with 8.5% w/w DOX gel.
DISCUSSION
The local application of the DOX gel evaluated in this study played a positive role on
the bone loss associated to experimental periodontal disease. This effect was associated
with reduction of the inflammatory reaction. Since the histopathological and AFM
analysis were done by a blind examiner for the test and control groups, the results of
the present study demonstrated that locally applied controlled-release DOX gel might
partly counteract the negative effect of periodontal plaque byproducts on periodontal
healing.The DOX gel showed an intense antiinflammatory activity inhibiting neutrophil
infiltration as early as 6 h after ePD induction, as seen by the reduction of MPO
activity on the gingival tissue. This effect was associated with a reduction in the
local inflammatory cell infiltration. Perhaps this effect was achieved because the gel
has a potent antibacterial activity[5].
Tetracycline and its derivatives have been shown to be inhibitors of matrix
metalloproteinase that are part of the inflammatory response and contribute to the
tissue breakdown in the periodontal disease[5].Topical application of active substances offers an additional option in periodontal
therapy[5,7,8]. In this present
study, a nanostructured gel was able to protect the periodontal structures in this
model. This effect was probably achieved by a controlled released system provided by
nanospheres loaded with DOX, as we can see the preservation of alveolar bone in Figure 9. DOX gel was studied in smokers to
investigate its inhibitory effect on experimental periodontal disease, showing
expressive results on this particular group of patients[20] as in other treatment groups[12].
Figure 9
Histopathology from the periodontium of rats subjected to periodontitis. 8.5%
Doxycycline (DOX) gel was administered topically immediately after ligature
placement and daily after periodontitis induction for 11 days. Photomicrograph of
the region between the first and second molars of rats: A represents the region
evaluated in all groups. Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining
Histopathology from the periodontium of rats subjected to periodontitis. 8.5%
Doxycycline (DOX) gel was administered topically immediately after ligature
placement and daily after periodontitis induction for 11 days. Photomicrograph of
the region between the first and second molars of rats: A represents the region
evaluated in all groups. Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) stainingPrevious studies have shown that DOX is one of the most potent and cost-effective TTC
commercially available[13,14,16], this clinical approach has been shown to reduce collagenase
production by osteoblasts and osteoclasts and also to delay osteoclast recruitment
following dental surgery[15]. DOX, as
other chemically modified tetracyclines (CMT), also possesses other pharmacologic
properties that may positively contribute for periodontal healing process[3,18,19]. Previous in vitro
studies have demonstrated that DOX inhibits proteases by blocking the conversion of
latent proteases into active mature forms and the activation of MMP’s by chelating metal
ions[23,24]. In a rat model, CMT reduced the activity of tissue degradation
enzymes such as myeloperoxidase and down-regulated bone resorption[5]. Also, systemic administration of low
doses of DOX in humans, which have negligible antimicrobial effects, resulted in
reduction of collagenase in gingival crevicular fluid[24]. Hence, since an increased protease activity is
associated with the induced periodontitis, these properties of DOX may offer an
additional explanation to the observed improved treatment outcome in this rat model that
received this locally delivered DOX system compared to a vehicle gel only.As shown in the alveolar bone height image in Figure
4, the use of the DOX gel for 1 min three times a day shows integrity of the
alveolar bone roughness surface, while in Figure 5
the AFM images show a partially destroyed alveolar bone surface height image.Concerning the topographical and roughness analysis, Figure 6 shows the height integrity of alveolar bone in Naïve group,
while in the vehicle gel group (Figure 7) is clear
to observe the narrower width and shallow height on the DOX group as well. We noticed
the strong contrast between the VG group when compared to the DOX group, which clearly
showed the presence of alveolar bone integrity. For better understanding of the method,
Figures 5 and 8 show a clear perspective on how the AFM regions were measured from a
regular histopathological section etched with xylol and then from the AFM specimens the
program could measure the surface roughness and topographical changes with high
accuracy.Based on the findings of this experiment, AFM methodology can be used to evaluate with a
systematic precision the alveolar bone structure and its surface regularity. The
sections in Figures 7 and 8 show the alveolar bone surface, with 670 nm in mean reaching
statistical difference when compared to the DOX group versus vehicle gel group,
approximately 50% of the surface shows a significant difference (p<0.05) on roughness
and topographical analysis after 11 days treatment. These findings lead us for a clearly
demonstration that the treatment of an 8.5 % w/w DOX nanostructured gel does prevents
denaturation of periodontal structures, especially the alveolar bone loss in this
model.
CONCLUSION
In summary, this study demonstrates a novel method to determine periodontal integrity in
experimentally induced periodontitis. The fact that tetracycline and its derivatives are
currently used as chronic treatments for periodontal disorders with a safety profile
highlights the need for further research in order to demonstrate their clinical use. It
was also demonstrated that AFM is a powerful tool used to evaluate the phases of the
process of experimental periodontal disease.
Authors: Carlos Ferreira Dos Santos; Vivien Thiemy Sakai; Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado; Daniela Nicole Schippers; Andrew Seth Greene Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: M I Ryder; B Pons; D Adams; B Beiswanger; V Blanco; G Bogle; K Donly; W Hallmon; E B Hancock; P Hanes; C Hawley; L Johnson; H L Wang; L Wolinsky; R Yukna; A Polson; G Carron; S Garrett Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: M A Botelho; N A P Nogueira; G M Bastos; S G C Fonseca; T L G Lemos; F J A Matos; D Montenegro; J Heukelbach; V S Rao; G A C Brito Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: M A Botelho; V S Rao; C B M Carvalho; J G Bezerra-Filho; S G C Fonseca; M L Vale; D Montenegro; F Cunha; R A Ribeiro; G A Brito Journal: J Ethnopharmacol Date: 2007-07-14 Impact factor: 4.360
Authors: M A Botelho; J G Martins; R S Ruela; Rachid I; J A Santos; J B Soares; M C França; D Montenegro; W S Ruela; L P Barros; D B Queiroz; R S Araujo; F C Sampio Journal: Phytother Res Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.878
Authors: L M Golub; T Sorsa; H M Lee; S Ciancio; D Sorbi; N S Ramamurthy; B Gruber; T Salo; Y T Konttinen Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: Jaime Bueno; Leire Virto; Manuel Toledano-Osorio; Elena Figuero; Manuel Toledano; Antonio L Medina-Castillo; Raquel Osorio; Mariano Sanz; David Herrera Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 4.329