Literature DB >> 20835392

Measures of Inequality: Application to Happiness in Nations.

W M Kalmijn, L R Arends.   

Abstract

What is a good measure for happiness inequality? In the context of this question, we have developed an approach in which individual happiness values in a sample are considered as elements of a set and inequality as a binary relation on that set. The total number of inequality relations, each weighed by the distance on the scale of measurement between the pair partners, has been adopted as an indicator for the inequality of the distribution as a whole. For models in which the happiness occurs as a continuous latent variable, an analogous approach has been developed on the basis of differentials. In principle, this fundamental approach results in a (zero) minimum value, and, more importantly, also in a maximum value. In the case where happiness is measured using a k-points scale, the maximum inequality is obtained if all ½N sample members select the lowest possible rating (Eq. 1) and the other ½N the highest possible one (k). This finding even applies to the truly ordinal case, i.e., if the distances between the successive ratings on the scale are unknown. It is, however, impossible to quantify the inequality of some measured sample distribution, unless all distances of the k categories of the scale of measurement are known or at least estimated, either on an empirical basis or on the basis of assumptions. In general, the numerical application of the method to continuous distributions is very complicated. An exploration on the basis of a relatively simple model with a linear probability density function suggests that the inequality of a beta probability distribution with shape parameters a and b increases as the value of these parameters decreases. A contour plot, obtained by numerical integration, demonstrates this relationship in a quantitative way. This approach is applicable to judge the aptness of common statistics of dispersion, among which the standard deviation and the Gini coefficient. The former is shown to be more appropriate than the latter for measuring inequality of happiness within nations.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20835392      PMCID: PMC2931760          DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9573-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Indic Res        ISSN: 0303-8300


  2 in total

1.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1946-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Happiness Scale Interval Study. Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  W M Kalmijn; L R Arends; R Veenhoven
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2010-08-24
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  The positive effects of parents' education level on children's mental health in Indonesia: a result of longitudinal survey.

Authors:  Dian Fakhrunnisak; Bhina Patria
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.135

2.  Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing country happiness on a global scale. A Rasch-based consequential validity analysis.

Authors:  Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdron
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

3.  Happiness inequality has a Kuznets-style relation with economic growth in China.

Authors:  Pan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.