Literature DB >> 2083492

A longitudinal study of two early intervention strategies: Project CARE.

B H Wasik1, C T Ramey, D M Bryant, J J Sparling.   

Abstract

65 families with children at risk for cognitive difficulties were randomly assigned at the time of the child's birth to 1 of 3 groups, 2 intervention and 1 control. For the most intensive intervention group, family education was combined with a center-based educational day-care program; the less intensive intervention group received the home-based family education program only. To assess the cognitive performance of children, The Bayley Scales of Infant Development were administered at 6, 12, and 18 months; the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test at 24, 36, and 48 months; and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities at 30, 42, and 54 months. On each test after the 6-month assessment, scores of children in the educational day-care plus family support group were greater than those in the other 2 groups. No cognitive intervention effects were obtained for the family education group. Group effects were not obtained for measures of either the quality of the home environment or parent attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2083492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  22 in total

Review 1.  Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  D Kendrick; R Elkan; M Hewitt; M Dewey; M Blair; J Robinson; D Williams; K Brummell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Early educational intervention, early cumulative risk, and the early home environment as predictors of young adult outcomes within a high-risk sample.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Pungello; Kirsten Kainz; Margaret Burchinal; Barbara H Wasik; Joseph J Sparling; Craig T Ramey; Frances A Campbell
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

3.  Maternal socio-economic and race/ethnic characteristics associated with early intervention participation.

Authors:  Karen M Clements; Wanda D Barfield; Milton Kotelchuck; Nancy Wilber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-11-16

4.  Early childhood education and crime.

Authors:  Jorge Luis García; James J Heckman; Anna L Ziff
Journal:  Infant Ment Health J       Date:  2019-01-09

Review 5.  WITHDRAWN: Day care for pre-school children.

Authors:  Bozhena Zoritch; Ian Roberts; Ann Oakley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-11

6.  Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Program.

Authors:  Jorge Luis García; James J Heckman; Anna L Ziff
Journal:  Eur Econ Rev       Date:  2018-06-30

7.  Family socioeconomic status and consistent environmental stimulation in early childhood.

Authors:  Robert Crosnoe; Tama Leventhal; R J Wirth; Kim M Pierce; Robert C Pianta
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 May-Jun

8.  The effects of early education intervention on maternal employment, public assistance, and health insurance: the infant health and development program.

Authors:  J Brooks-Gunn; M C McCormick; S Shapiro; A Benasich; G W Black
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Brain research to ameliorate impaired neurodevelopment--home-based intervention trial (BRAIN-HIT).

Authors:  Jan L Wallander; Elizabeth McClure; Fred Biasini; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Omrana Pasha; Elwyn Chomba; Darlene Shearer; Linda Wright; Vanessa Thorsten; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Sangappa M Dhaded; Niranjana S Mahantshetti; Roopa M Bellad; Zahid Abbasi; Waldemar Carlo
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Prenatal alcohol and other early childhood adverse exposures: Direct and indirect pathways to adolescent drinking.

Authors:  Marie D Cornelius; Natacha M De Genna; Lidush Goldschmidt; Cynthia Larkby; Nancy L Day
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.