Literature DB >> 20834045

Guided motor imagery in healthy adults and stroke: does strategy matter?

Cindy L Hovington1, Brenda Brouwer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor imagery (MI) enhances physical performance and skill acquisition in healthy and neurorehabilitation populations, yet little is known about the use of strategies to guide MI.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relative effectiveness of visual, auditory, and combined (visual + auditory) cueing of an imagined finger abduction task on corticomotor excitability.
METHODS: A total of 15 young (20-35 years) and 15 older people (over 55 years) and 10 people with chronic stroke, who could make voluntary movements of selected muscles, participated. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs, primary outcome) were measured following transcranial magnetic stimulation applied while participants imagined abducting their index finger under guidance of cueing strategies. Amplitudes of the MEPs from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles were compared with rest, contrasted with MEPs elicited during active task performance, and expressed relative to rest to reflect facilitation.
RESULTS: Cued MI enhanced MEPs in all groups, preferentially to the target FDI muscle. In stroke, APB was also facilitated. ADM was least affected by cueing. Analyses of simple effects of condition on FDI MEPs in each group revealed that visual cueing was most effective in young people, whereas auditory cueing was most effective in healthy older people and when directed at the nonparetic side in stroke ( P < .04). On the paretic side, strategies were equally effective. In all cases, MEPs were largest during physical performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Cued MI augments corticomotor excitability associated with healthy and paretic muscles related to the imagined task. Age should be considered when selecting a cueing strategy for maximum effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20834045     DOI: 10.1177/1545968310374190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  7 in total

1.  Translation of basic research in cognitive science to HIV-risk: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alan W Stacy; Liesl A Nydegger; Yusuke Shono
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-12-15

Review 2.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Mental images across the adult lifespan: a behavioural and fMRI investigation of motor execution and motor imagery.

Authors:  L Zapparoli; P Invernizzi; M Gandola; M Verardi; M Berlingeri; M Sberna; A De Santis; A Zerbi; G Banfi; G Bottini; E Paulesu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Corticocortical paired associative stimulation for treating motor dysfunction after stroke: study protocol for a randomised sham-controlled double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Duan; Xu-Yun Hua; Mou-Xiong Zheng; Jia-Jia Wu; Xiang-Xin Xing; Yu-Lin Li; Jian-Guang Xu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Using Motor Imagery to Access Alternative Attentional Strategies When Navigating Environmental Boundaries to Prevent Freezing of Gait - A Perspective.

Authors:  Daniella How; Heiko Wagner; Michael Brach
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Mind-body medicine for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela Senders; Helané Wahbeh; Rebecca Spain; Lynne Shinto
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2012-11-22

7.  Effects of healthy ageing on activation pattern within the primary motor cortex during movement and motor imagery: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Nikhil Sharma; Jean-Claude Baron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.