OBJECTIVE: To report and describe the possible correlation of a change in syringe sale policy at a community pharmacy with an adverse clinical outcome. SETTING: Providence, RI, in summer 2009. PATIENT DESCRIPTION: 27-year-old white woman with a long-standing history of chronic relapsing opiate addiction and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. CASE SUMMARY: The patient presented to the hospital emergency department with 5 days of severe diffuse pain, swelling in her hands and feet, and several days of rigors with fevers, sweats, and chills. She was diagnosed with sepsis resulting from a disseminated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics, neurosurgical drainage of an epidural abscess, intensive care unit care for 1 week, and acute hospitalization for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: A few weeks before the patient was hospitalized, pharmacists at her local neighborhood pharmacy decided to stop selling syringes in packages of 10. Instead, syringes were sold at a minimum quantity of 100. The patient did not know where to obtain sterile syringes and began reusing syringes. CONCLUSION: The patient introduced pathogenic bacteria from her skin into her bloodstream through unsafe injection practices. The change in syringe sale policy at her local pharmacy likely inadvertently contributed to this severe and life-threatening situation. Consideration of the implications of syringe sale policy must include an understanding of the barriers that influence individual pharmacist's decisions regarding particular store policies that affect over-the-counter syringe sales. Legalized sale of nonprescription syringes in community pharmacies alone is not enough to curb the epidemic of unsafe injection practices in the United States. All medical risks that are inherent in the use of unsafe syringes, including blood-borne viral pathogens (e.g., HIV, HCV) and bacterial infections (e.g., MRSA), should be considered.
OBJECTIVE: To report and describe the possible correlation of a change in syringe sale policy at a community pharmacy with an adverse clinical outcome. SETTING: Providence, RI, in summer 2009. PATIENT DESCRIPTION: 27-year-old white woman with a long-standing history of chronic relapsing opiate addiction and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. CASE SUMMARY: The patient presented to the hospital emergency department with 5 days of severe diffuse pain, swelling in her hands and feet, and several days of rigors with fevers, sweats, and chills. She was diagnosed with sepsis resulting from a disseminated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics, neurosurgical drainage of an epidural abscess, intensive care unit care for 1 week, and acute hospitalization for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: A few weeks before the patient was hospitalized, pharmacists at her local neighborhood pharmacy decided to stop selling syringes in packages of 10. Instead, syringes were sold at a minimum quantity of 100. The patient did not know where to obtain sterile syringes and began reusing syringes. CONCLUSION: The patient introduced pathogenic bacteria from her skin into her bloodstream through unsafe injection practices. The change in syringe sale policy at her local pharmacy likely inadvertently contributed to this severe and life-threatening situation. Consideration of the implications of syringe sale policy must include an understanding of the barriers that influence individual pharmacist's decisions regarding particular store policies that affect over-the-counter syringe sales. Legalized sale of nonprescription syringes in community pharmacies alone is not enough to curb the epidemic of unsafe injection practices in the United States. All medical risks that are inherent in the use of unsafe syringes, including blood-borne viral pathogens (e.g., HIV, HCV) and bacterial infections (e.g., MRSA), should be considered.
Authors: Don C Des Jarlais; Theresa Perlis; Kamyar Arasteh; Lucia V Torian; Sara Beatrice; Judith Milliken; Donna Mildvan; Stanley Yancovitz; Samuel R Friedman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: R Dwyer; L Topp; L Maher; R Power; M Hellard; N Walsh; M Jauncey; A Conroy; J Lewis; C Aitken Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Haven B Battles; Kirsten A Rowe; Christina Ortega-Peluso; Susan J Klein; James M Tesoriero Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Nickolas D Zaller; Michael A Yokell; Sandeep M Nayak; Jeannia J Fu; Alexander R Bazazi; Josiah D Rich Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.671