Literature DB >> 20833349

Quality assurance of endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Roland Valori1, Jerome Sint Nicolaas, Vincent de Jonge.   

Abstract

This chapter explores the concept of quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening. It argues that effective quality assurance is critical to ensure that the benefits of screening outweigh the harms. The three key steps of quality assurance, definition of standards, measurement of standards and enforcement of standards, are explained. Quality is viewed from the perspective of the patient and illustrated by following the path of patients accessing endoscopy within screening services. The chapter discusses the pros and cons of programmatic versus non-programmatic screening and argues that quality assurance of screening can and should benefit symptomatic services. Finally, the chapter emphasises the importance of a culture of excellence underpinned by continuous quality improvement and effective service leadership.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833349     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  14 in total

Review 1.  [International status colorectal cancer screening and quality assurance of screening-colonoscopy].

Authors:  Nikolaus Patera; Claudia Wild
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-05

Review 2.  Colonoscopy quality assurance in Ontario: Systematic review and clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Erin B Kennedy; David Baron; Mae Burke; Stanley Feinberg; Michael Gould; Nancy Baxter; Nancy Lewis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05

3.  Editorial: The Name Game: Circumventing Quality Metrics by Categorizing Incomplete Colonoscopy as Sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaz; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Quality assurance in the endoscopy unit: the view of endoscopy personnel.

Authors:  V de Jonge; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-13

Review 5.  A literature review of quality in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Shasha Gong; Catherine Dube; Alan Barkun; Robert Hilsden; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Patient-identified quality indicators for colonoscopy services.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Catherine Dubé; Stephanie Brien; Mengzhu Jiang; Robert J Hilsden; Alan N Barkun; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Interobserver variability in comfort scores for screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  David N Naumann; Sarah Potter-Concannon; Sharad Karandikar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-22

9.  Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality.

Authors:  Mengzhu Jiang; Maida J Sewitch; Alan N Barkun; Lawrence Joseph; Robert J Hilsden
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Endoscopist-related factors contributing to high-quality colonoscopy: results of a Delphi survey.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Arjun D Koch; Jelle Haringsma; Ernst J Kuipers; Robert A De Man
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.