Literature DB >> 2083311

Recall bias in subjective reports of familial cancer.

B Floderus1, L Barlow, T M Mack.   

Abstract

Both twins in a pair in which one had suffered breast cancer (115 pairs) were asked about the occurrence of cancer among first- and second-degree relatives. For all cancer sites together, there was agreement about 129 cases; another 48 cancers were mentioned only by the case twin and another 55 only by the co-twin. For breast cancer, there was agreement about 22 events; another 12 cases were provided by the cancer twin and four by the co-twin. The odds ratio for a family history of cancer was 1.14; for breast cancer the corresponding value was 1.48. The results are suggestive of some recall bias in subjective reports on familial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2083311     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199007000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  10 in total

1.  Inflation of sibling recurrence-risk ratio, due to ascertainment bias and/or overreporting.

Authors:  S W Guo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Changes in self-reported family history of breast cancer with change in case-control status.

Authors:  V Garbers; P G Toniolo; E Taioli
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Family history and risk of breast cancer: nurses' health study.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Family history of skin cancer is associated with increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Maryam M Asgari; E Margaret Warton; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.398

5.  Self-reported chemicals exposure, beliefs about disease causation, and risk of breast cancer in the Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Ann Aschengrau; Ruthann A Rudel; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D Brewster; H Campbell; M E M Porteous; A H Wyllie; C C Bird; M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Familial risk of colo-rectal cancer in a low incidence area in southern Italy.

Authors:  S Centonze; H Boeing; C Leoci; C Bonfiglio; V Guerra; G Misciagna
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Physical activity and premenopausal breast cancer: an examination of recall and selection bias.

Authors:  Sonia S Maruti; Walter C Willett; Diane Feskanich; Beverly Levine; Bernard Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Prospective study of family history and colorectal cancer risk by tumor LINE-1 methylation level.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Reiko Nishihara; Paul Lochhead; Yu Imamura; Aya Kuchiba; Teppei Morikawa; Mai Yamauchi; Xiaoyun Liao; Zhi Rong Qian; Ruifang Sun; Kaori Sato; Gregory J Kirkner; Molin Wang; Donna Spiegelman; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Eva S Schernhammer; Andrew T Chan; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Clustering of cancer among families of cases with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), Multiple Myeloma (MM), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) and control subjects.

Authors:  Helen H McDuffie; Punam Pahwa; Chandima P Karunanayake; John J Spinelli; James A Dosman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.