Literature DB >> 2083308

Reproducibility of food frequency measurements and inferences from a case-control study.

A Morabia1, M Moore, E L Wynder.   

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between the reproducibility of measurements of exposure from a frequency questionnaire and inferences from a case-control study, 229 patients were reinterviewed on the telephone an average of 6 weeks after the original interview. Several indices of agreement were computed. Information on smoking and use of alcohol and coffee was quite reproducible, as reflected by most measures of agreement, using grouped or continuous data. Frequency of meat, vegetable, and fruit intake had low reproducibility. For all variables, reproducibility was similar for cases and controls. Reproducibility of the exposure variables was a good predictor of the reproducibility of the relative odds (RO) obtained with the first and the repeat interviews. Lack of reliability of the exposure variable appeared to produce fluctuations in the ROs in either direction, even though the same degree of agreement was observed for cases and controls. This situation may partially explain discrepant findings between case-control studies of diet and chronic diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2083308     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199007000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  4 in total

1.  Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary nutrients for prevention and management of metabolic syndrome in Korea.

Authors:  Yun-Jung Bae; Hae-Yeon Choi; Mi-Kyung Sung; Mi-Kyung Kim; Mi-Kyeong Choi
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 1.926

2.  The consumption of well-done red meat and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J E Muscat; E L Wynder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Test-retest reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and estimated effects on disease risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC).

Authors:  Christine L Parr; Marit B Veierød; Petter Laake; Eiliv Lund; Anette Hjartåker
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Gender differences in lung cancer risk by smoking: a multicentre case-control study in Germany and Italy.

Authors:  M Kreuzer; P Boffetta; E Whitley; W Ahrens; V Gaborieau; J Heinrich; K H Jöckel; L Kreienbrock; S Mallone; F Merletti; F Roesch; P Zambon; L Simonato
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.