Literature DB >> 2083303

Barrier and spermicidal contraceptive methods and risk of invasive cervical cancer.

A Hildesheim1, L A Brinton, K Mallin, H F Lehman, P Stolley, D A Savitz, R Levine.   

Abstract

The effects of barrier and spermicidal methods of contraception on cervical cancer risk were examined by studying 479 cases of histologically confirmed invasive cervical cancer cases and 788 random digit dialing controls. In addition to a detailed history of contraceptive practices, information was available on numerous potential confounders, including demographic characteristics, sexual behavior, reproductive factors, Pap smear screening history, and smoking. After adjustment for relevant confounders, diaphragm and condom use were found not to be significantly associated with risk of cervical cancer. Although there was a small reduction in risk (OR = 0.8) associated with long-term use (5+ years) of the diaphragm, the effect appeared to relate to concomitant spermicide use, since there was evidence of further decreases in risk for women using spermicides alone for extended periods (OR = 0.7 for 5+ years). Effects were only seen among subjects of higher income and education levels, suggesting that patterns of usage may be important. The potential ability of spermicides to reduce cervical cancer risk by neutralizing viral agents warrants further attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Barrier Methods; Behavior; Biology; Cancer; Case Control Studies; Cervical Cancer; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive History; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Economic Factors; Educational Status; Family Planning; Iud; Longterm Effects; Multiple Partners; Neoplasms; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives; Population; Population Dynamics; Previous Practice; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Sex Behavior; Sexual Partners; Smoking; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Statistical Studies; Studies; Time Factors; United States; Vaginal Barrier Methods; Vaginal Diaphragm; Vaginal Spermicides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2083303     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199007000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  5 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions.

Authors:  A M Minnis; N S Padian
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Priorities for vaginal microbicide research.

Authors:  D C Sokal; P L Hermonat
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  How safe are safes? Efficacy and effectiveness of condoms in preventing STDs.

Authors:  B A Morris
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Commentary: methods women can use that may prevent sexually transmitted disease, including HIV.

Authors:  M J Rosenberg; E L Gollub
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Cervical cytological changes in HIV-infected patients attending care and treatment clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Amos R Mwakigonja; Liset Maria M Torres; Henry A Mwakyoma; Ephata E Kaaya
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.965

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.