Literature DB >> 20832985

Palliative sedation, not slow euthanasia: a prospective, longitudinal study of sedation in Flemish palliative care units.

Patricia Claessens1, Johan Menten2, Paul Schotsmans3, Bert Broeckaert4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Palliative sedation remains a much debated and controversial issue. The limited literature on the topic often fails to answer ethical questions concerning this practice.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients who are being sedated for refractory symptoms in palliative care units (PCUs) from the time of admission until the day of death.
METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive design was used to assess data in eight PCUs. The total sample consisted of 266 patients. Information on demographics, medication, food and fluid intake, decision making, level of consciousness, and symptom experience were gathered by nurses and researchers three times a week. If patients received palliative sedation, extra information was gathered.
RESULTS: Of all included patients (n=266), 7.5% received palliative sedation. Sedation started, on average, 2.5 days before death and for half of these patients, the form of sedation changed over time. At the start of sedation, patients were in the end stage of their illness and needed total care. Patients were fully conscious and had very limited oral food or fluid intake. Only three patients received artificial fluids at the start of sedation. Patients reported, on average, two refractory symptoms, the most important ones being pain, fatigue, depression, drowsiness, and loss of feeling of well-being. In all cases, the patient gave consent to start palliative sedation because of increased suffering.
CONCLUSION: This study revealed that palliative sedation is only administered in exceptional cases where refractory suffering is evident and for those patients who are close to the ends of their lives. Moreover, this study supports the argument that palliative sedation has no life-shortening effect.
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832985     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  7 in total

1.  The EAPC framework on palliative sedation and clinical practice--a questionnaire-based survey in Germany.

Authors:  Philipp R Klosa; Carsten Klein; Maria Heckel; Alexandra C Bronnhuber; Christoph Ostgathe; Stephanie Stiel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Palliative sedation for terminally ill cancer patients in a tertiary cancer center in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Xiaoli Gu; Wenwu Cheng; Menglei Chen; Minghui Liu; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Reflections on palliative sedation.

Authors:  Robert Twycross
Journal:  Palliat Care       Date:  2019-01-27

4.  Identification and evaluation of observational measures for the assessment and/or monitoring of level of consciousness in adult palliative care patients: A systematic review for I-CAN-CARE.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Krooupa; Bella Vivat; Stephen McKeever; Elena Marcus; Joseph Sawyer; Paddy Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.713

5.  Palliative sedation at home.

Authors:  B Barathi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2012-01

6.  Palliative Sedation in Advanced Cancer Patients: Does it Shorten Survival Time? - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  B Barathi; Prabha S Chandra
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01

7.  Medicalisation, suffering and control at the end of life: The interplay of deep continuous palliative sedation and assisted dying.

Authors:  Gitte Hanssen Koksvik; Naomi Richards; Sheri Mila Gerson; Lars Johan Materstvedt; David Clark
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2020-12-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.