Literature DB >> 20832676

Prevalence of and risk factors for Campylobacter spp. contamination of broiler chicken carcasses at the slaughterhouse.

Olivier Hue1, Sophie Le Bouquin, Marie-José Laisney, Virginie Allain, Françoise Lalande, Isabelle Petetin, Sandra Rouxel, Ségolène Quesne, Pierre-Yves Gloaguen, Mélanie Picherot, Julien Santolini, Gilles Salvat, Stéphanie Bougeard, Marianne Chemaly.   

Abstract

A study was conducted in 2008 to estimate the prevalence and identify the risk factors for Campylobacter spp. contamination of broiler carcasses during the slaughtering process. A pool of 10 caeca and one carcass were collected from 425 batches of broiler chickens slaughtered in 58 French slaughterhouses over a 12-month period. Potential risk factors were identified according to the Campylobacter contamination status of carcasses and processing variables identified from questionnaires. The statistical analysis took into account confounding factors that have already been associated with the presence of Campylobacter on carcasses such as the slaughter age of the chicken or seasonal variations. Campylobacter spp. were isolated from 77.2% of caeca (95% CI 73.2 to 81.2) and from 87.5% of carcasses (95% CI 84.4 to 90.7). A multiple logistic regression showed 4 parameters as significant risk factors (p < 0.05) for contamination: (I) batches were not the first to be slaughtered in the logistic schedule (OR = 3.5), (II) temperature in the evisceration room was higher than 15 °C (OR = 3.1), (III) dirty marks on carcasses after evisceration were visible (OR = 2.6) and (IV) previous thinning of the flocks, from which slaughtered batches came, had occurred at the farm (OR = 3.3). This last result highlighted the need for sanitary precautions to be taken when catching birds for transport. At the slaughterhouse, evisceration seemed to be the operation contributing most to the spread of contamination. Effective risk management solutions could include the systematic external rinsing of carcasses after evisceration and the implementation of slaughtering schedules according to the Campylobacter contamination status of flocks.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832676     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  22 in total

1.  Effect of Probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 Supplementation on the Growth Performance, Immune Responses, Intestinal Morphology, and Gut Microbes of Campylobacter jejuni Infected Chickens.

Authors:  Yosra A Helmy; Gary Closs; Kwonil Jung; Dipak Kathayat; Anastasia Vlasova; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Genome-Wide Identification of Host-Segregating Epidemiological Markers for Source Attribution in Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Amandine Thépault; Guillaume Méric; Katell Rivoal; Ben Pascoe; Leonardos Mageiros; Fabrice Touzain; Valérie Rose; Véronique Béven; Marianne Chemaly; Samuel K Sheppard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Antimicrobial Resistance, FlaA Sequencing, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chicken Flocks in Greece.

Authors:  George Natsos; Niki K Mouttotou; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Anastasios Ioannidis; Maria Magana; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Konstantinos C Koutoulis
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  Effect of enhanced biosecurity and selected on-farm factors on Campylobacter colonization of chicken broilers.

Authors:  M Georgiev; W Beauvais; J Guitian
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks and on broiler carcases, and the risks associated with highly contaminated carcases.

Authors:  L F Powell; J R Lawes; F A Clifton-Hadley; J Rodgers; K Harris; S J Evans; A Vidal
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter isolates from poultry production units in southern Ireland.

Authors:  Emer O'Mahony; James F Buckley; Declan Bolton; Paul Whyte; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Screening of Anti-Campylobacter Activity in Probiotics for Use in Poultry.

Authors:  Manuel J Saint-Cyr; Muriel Guyard-Nicodème; Soumaya Messaoudi; Marianne Chemaly; Jean-Michel Cappelier; Xavier Dousset; Nabila Haddad
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  The impact of biosecurity and partial depopulation on Campylobacter prevalence in Irish broiler flocks with differing levels of hygiene and economic performance.

Authors:  Shaun Smith; Locksley L McV Messam; Joseph Meade; James Gibbons; Kevina McGill; Declan Bolton; Paul Whyte
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-10

9.  Antibiotic Susceptibility, Genetic Diversity, and the Presence of Toxin Producing Genes in Campylobacter Isolates from Poultry.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Jiyeon Jeong; Heeyoung Lee; Jimyeong Ha; Sejeong Kim; Yukyung Choi; Hyemin Oh; Kunho Seo; Yohan Yoon; Soomin Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Campylobacteriosis outbreak associated with consumption of undercooked chicken liver pâté in the East of England, September 2011: identification of a dose-response risk.

Authors:  D S Edwards; L M Milne; K Morrow; P Sheridan; N Q Verlander; R Mulla; J F Richardson; A Pender; M Lilley; M Reacher
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.