Literature DB >> 20832548

Sirolimus in liver transplant recipients: a large single-center experience.

M Vivarelli1, A Dazzi, A Cucchetti, A Gasbarrini, M Zanello, P Di Gioia, G Bianchi, M R Tamè, M D Gaudio, M Ravaioli, M Cescon, G L Grazi, A D Pinna.   

Abstract

Sirolimus (SRL) is a newer immunosuppressant whose possible benefits and side effects in comparison to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) still have to be addressed in the liver transplantation setting. We report the results of the use of SRL in 86 liver transplant recipients, 38 of whom received SRL as the main immunosuppressant in a CNI-sparing regimen. Indications for the use of SRL were: impaired renal function (n = 32), CNI neurotoxicity (n = 16), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high risk of recurrence (n = 21), recurrence of HCC (n = 6), de novo malignancies (n = 4), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), and the need to reinforce immunosuppression (n = 6). Among patients on SRL-based treatment, four episodes of acute rejection were observed, three of which occurred during the first postoperative month. Renal function significantly improved when sirolimus was introduced within the third postoperative month, while no change was observed when it was introduced later. Neurological symptoms resolved completely in 14/16 patients. The 3-year recurrence-free survival of patients with HCC on SRL was 84%. Sixty-two patients developed side effects that required drug withdrawal in seven cases. There was a reduced prevalence of hypertension and new-onset diabetes among patients under SRL. In conclusion, SRL was an effective immunosuppressant even when used in a CNI-sparing regimen. It was beneficial for patients with recently developed renal dysfunction or neurological disorders. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832548     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  13 in total

1.  Tailored long-term immunosuppressive regimen for adult liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sung-Hwa Kang; Shin Hwang; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Ki-Hun Kim; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Gil-Chun Park; Bo-Hyun Jung; Young-In Yoon; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2014-05-31

2.  [National S3 guidelines on hepatocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  C M Sommer; U Stampfl; H U Kauczor; P L Pereira
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Current and Future Treatment Strategies for Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Role of mTOR Inhibition.

Authors:  Richard S Finn
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.740

4.  Sirolimus and MMF are insufficient immunosuppressants for regulation of the proliferation of CD133+EpCAM+ cell populations in HCC cell lines.

Authors:  Hwajung Kim; Kwang-Woong Lee; Seung Cheol Oh; Min-Young Park; Sooin Seo; Xue-Li Jin; Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung Chul Yoon; Nam-Joon Yi; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2020-10-20

Review 5.  Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation: what about the impact of immunosuppression?

Authors:  Jan Lerut; Samuele Iesari; Maxime Foguenne; Quirino Lai
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-12

6.  [Diagnosis of and therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  T F Greten; N P Malek; S Schmidt; J Arends; P Bartenstein; W Bechstein; T Bernatik; M Bitzer; A Chavan; M Dollinger; D Domagk; O Drognitz; M Düx; S Farkas; G Folprecht; P Galle; M Geißler; G Gerken; D Habermehl; T Helmberger; K Herfarth; R T Hoffmann; M Holtmann; P Huppert; T Jakobs; M Keller; J Klempnauer; F Kolligs; J Körber; H Lang; F Lehner; F Lordick; A Lubienski; M P Manns; A Mahnken; M Möhler; C Mönch; P Neuhaus; C Niederau; M Ocker; G Otto; P Pereira; G Pott; J Riemer; K Ringe; U Ritterbusch; E Rummeny; P Schirmacher; H J Schlitt; K Schlottmann; V Schmitz; A Schuler; H Schulze-Bergkamen; D von Schweinitz; D Seehofer; H Sitter; C P Straßburg; C Stroszczynski; D Strobel; A Tannapfel; J Trojan; I van Thiel; A Vogel; F Wacker; H Wedemeyer; H Wege; A Weinmann; C Wittekind; B Wörmann; C J Zech
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Evidence for rapamycin toxicity in pancreatic β-cells and a review of the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Adam D Barlow; Michael L Nicholson; Terry P Herbert
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization in liver transplant patients with calcineurin-inhibitor-related renal dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Kong; Dongping Wang; Yushu Shang; Wenhua Liang; Xiaoting Ling; Zhiyong Guo; Xiaoshun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence.

Authors:  Goran B Klintmalm; Björn Nashan
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2014-02-25

Review 10.  Evolving concepts in the selection of immunosuppression regimen for liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Andrew L Singer
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2011-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.