OBJECTIVE: To determine if directly observed antiretroviral therapy (DOT) is more efficacious than self-administered therapy for improving adherence and reducing HIV viral load (VL) among methadone-maintained opioid users. DESIGN: Two-group randomized trial. SETTING: Twelve methadone maintenance clinics with on-site HIV care in the Bronx, New York. PARTICIPANTS: HIV-infected adults prescribed combination antiretroviral therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Between group differences at four assessment points from baseline to week 24 in: (1) antiretroviral adherence measured by pill count, (2) VL, and (3) proportion with undetectable VL (< 75 copies/ml). RESULTS:Between June 2004 and August 2007, we enrolled 77 participants. Adherence in the DOT group was higher than in the control group at all post-baseline assessment points; by week 24 mean DOT adherence was 86% compared to 56% in the control group (p < 0.0001). Group differences in mean adherence remained significant after stratifying by baseline VL (detectable versus undetectable). In addition, during the 24-week intervention, the proportion of DOT participants with undetectable VL increased from 51% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Among HIV-infected opioid users, antiretroviral DOT administered in methadone clinics was efficacious for improving adherence and decreasing VL, and these improvements were maintained over a 24-week period. DOT should be more widely available to methadone patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine if directly observed antiretroviral therapy (DOT) is more efficacious than self-administered therapy for improving adherence and reducing HIV viral load (VL) among methadone-maintained opioid users. DESIGN: Two-group randomized trial. SETTING: Twelve methadone maintenance clinics with on-site HIV care in the Bronx, New York. PARTICIPANTS: HIV-infected adults prescribed combination antiretroviral therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Between group differences at four assessment points from baseline to week 24 in: (1) antiretroviral adherence measured by pill count, (2) VL, and (3) proportion with undetectable VL (< 75 copies/ml). RESULTS: Between June 2004 and August 2007, we enrolled 77 participants. Adherence in the DOT group was higher than in the control group at all post-baseline assessment points; by week 24 mean DOT adherence was 86% compared to 56% in the control group (p < 0.0001). Group differences in mean adherence remained significant after stratifying by baseline VL (detectable versus undetectable). In addition, during the 24-week intervention, the proportion of DOT participants with undetectable VL increased from 51% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Among HIV-infected opioid users, antiretroviral DOT administered in methadone clinics was efficacious for improving adherence and decreasing VL, and these improvements were maintained over a 24-week period. DOT should be more widely available to methadonepatients.
Authors: D C Des Jarlais; D Paone; J Milliken; C F Turner; H Miller; J Gribble; Q Shi; H Hagan; S R Friedman Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-05-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer A Mitty; Grace E Macalino; Lauri B Bazerman; Helen G Loewenthal; Joseph W Hogan; Cynthia J MacLeod; Timothy P Flanigan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Karina M Berg; Penelope A Demas; Andrea A Howard; Ellie E Schoenbaum; Marc N Gourevitch; Julia H Arnsten Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gregory M Lucas; B Anna Mullen; Paul J Weidle; Shannon Hader; Mary E McCaul; Richard D Moore Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-04-28 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Amy Rock Wohl; Wendy H Garland; Rosa Valencia; Kathleen Squires; Mallory D Witt; Andrea Kovacs; Robert Larsen; Shannon Hader; Monique-Nicole Anthony; Paul J Weidle Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-04-28 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Frederick L Altice; Jo Anne Mezger; John Hodges; Robert D Bruce; Adrian Marinovich; Mary Walton; Sandra A Springer; Gerald H Friedland Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: S E Weis; P C Slocum; F X Blais; B King; M Nunn; G B Matney; E Gomez; B H Foresman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C M Brust; Alain H Litwin; Karina M Berg; Xuan Li; Moonseong Heo; Julia H Arnsten Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Jaimie P Meyer; Javier Cepeda; Johnny Wu; Robert L Trestman; Frederick L Altice; Sandra A Springer Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Barrot H Lambdin; Frank Masao; Olivia Chang; Pamela Kaduri; Jessie Mbwambo; Ayoub Magimba; Norman Sabuni; R Douglas Bruce Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Shadi Nahvi; Alain H Litwin; Moonseong Heo; Karina M Berg; Xuan Li; Julia H Arnsten Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Mahnaz R Charania; Khiya J Marshall; Cynthia M Lyles; Nicole Crepaz; Linda S Kay; Linda J Koenig; Paul J Weidle; David W Purcell Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-04
Authors: Kathleen A McGinnis; David A Fiellin; Melissa Skanderson; Yih-Ing Hser; Gregory M Lucas; Amy C Justice; Janet P Tate Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 4.492