Literature DB >> 20832126

Marked differences between MARC-145 cells and swine alveolar macrophages in IFNβ-induced activation of antiviral state against PRRSV.

D He1, C Overend, J Ambrogio, R J Maganti, M J Grubman, A E Garmendia.   

Abstract

The activation of antiviral activity induced by recombinant swine interferon beta (rswIFNβ) against PRRSV was comparatively examined in MARC-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). A dose-response analysis showed, in MARC-145 cells, that isolate Mo25544 was highly sensitive to rswIFNβ while a vaccine strain and isolate PDV130-9301 were resistant to different extents. In contrast, all three viruses were equally sensitive to rswIFNβ in PAMs even at the lowest dose of IFN utilized in the bioassays. To analyze potential differences in mechanisms of antiviral activation between these cells, treatment with 2-aminopurine (2-AP), an inhibitor of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR), was performed in rswIFNβ-treated cells. Addition of 2-AP to rswIFNβ-primed MARC-145 cells restored replication of the Mo25544 isolate, and to some extent that of vaccine virus and PDV130-9301. In contrast, virus replication could not be rescued for any of the three viruses with 2-AP in rswIFNβ-treated PAMs. The differences in sensitivity of PRRSV to rswIFNβ as well as the effects of 2-AP strongly suggest that MARC-145 cells and PAMs utilize different rswIFNβ-associated antiviral pathways. Therefore, studies to understand virus-host cell interactions performed in MARC-145 cells require additional scrutiny when utilized as a host cell model for immunologic responses to PRRSV. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832126     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  6 in total

1.  The activation of the IFNβ induction/signaling pathway in porcine alveolar macrophages by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus is variable.

Authors:  Christopher C Overend; Junru Cui; Marvin J Grubman; Antonio E Garmendia
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 2.  Interplay between interferon-mediated innate immunity and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Mingyuan Han; Chiyong Kim; Jay G Calvert; Dongwan Yoo
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 3.  Post-transcriptional control of type I interferon induction by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in its natural host cells.

Authors:  Xiuqing Wang; Jane Christopher-Hennings
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  The Swine IFN System in Viral Infections: Major Advances and Translational Prospects.

Authors:  Elisabetta Razzuoli; Federico Armando; Livia De Paolis; Malgorzata Ciurkiewicz; Massimo Amadori
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 5.  Antagonizing interferon-mediated immune response by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Yan-Jin Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus suppresses post-transcriptionally the protein expression of IFN-β by upregulating cellular microRNAs in porcine alveolar macrophages in vitro.

Authors:  Lilin Wang; Lei Zhou; Dongmei Hu; Xinna Ge; Xin Guo; Hanchun Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.