Literature DB >> 20832120

Responsiveness of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults undergoing Strabismus surgery.

Sarah R Hatt1, David A Leske, Jonathan M Holmes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the responsiveness of 2 health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires, the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), to changes in HRQOL after strabismus surgery.
DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 106 adults (aged 18-84 years; median, 48.5) undergoing strabismus surgery, 80 (75%) with diplopia and 26 (25%) without diplopia.
METHODS: All participants completed AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires preoperatively and a median of 7 weeks (range, 4-13) postoperatively. Using predefined clinical criteria, postoperative outcomes were graded as either "success" (n = 65), "partial success" (n = 32), or "failure" (n = 9). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For each questionnaire, mean composite and subscale scores (range, 0-100; worst to best HRQOL) were calculated for each patient. Median change in scores pre- to postoperatively was compared for successes, partial successes, and failures, and the proportion of patients whose scores exceeded 95% limits of agreement was calculated.
RESULTS: Successfully aligned diplopic patients (n = 46) showed greater improvement than failures (n = 7) using both the AS-20 questionnaire (21.3 [quartiles 12.5-35.0] vs. 8.8 [3.8-12.5]; P = 0.002) and the VFQ-25 questionnaire (18.3 [8.6-26.1] vs 8.3 [0.8-13.5]; P = 0.02). Successfully aligned nondiplopic patients (n = 19) also showed greater improvement than failures (n = 2; AS-20, 23.8 [10.0-32.5] vs -3.1 [-10.0 to 3.8]; P = 0.05). In nondiplopic patients, changes on VFQ-25 were small but significantly greater for successes than failures (5.0 [0.0-10.1] vs -15.4 [-19.4 to -11.4]; P = 0.03). More successfully aligned patients showed improvement exceeding the 95% limits of agreement for AS-20 scores than VFQ-25 scores (67% vs 65% [P = 0.8] for diplopic patients and 63% vs 21% [P = 0.005] for nondiplopic patients).
CONCLUSIONS: The AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires are responsive to improved HRQOL in adults undergoing successful strabismus surgery. Changes on VFQ-25 were smaller, particularly for nondiplopic strabismus. The AS-20 is more responsive than the VFQ-25 across the range of adult strabismus.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832120      PMCID: PMC2997934          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  The psychosocial aspects of strabismus in teenagers and adults and the impact of surgical correction.

Authors:  Bradley A Nelson; Kammi B Gunton; Judith N Lasker; Leonard B Nelson; Lea Ann Drohan
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  The psychosocial benefits of corrective surgery for adults with strabismus.

Authors:  S Jackson; R A Harrad; M Morris; N Rumsey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The management of strabismus in adults--III. The effects on disability.

Authors:  George R Beauchamp; Bradley C Black; David K Coats; Robert W Enzenauer; Amy K Hutchinson; Richard A Saunders; John W Simon; David R Stager; David R Stager; M Edward Wilson; Jitka Zobal-Ratner; Joost Felius
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Psychosocial aspects of strabismus study.

Authors:  D Satterfield; J L Keltner; T L Morrison
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08

6.  Vision-related quality of life and emotional impact in children with strabismus: a prospective study.

Authors:  Y Chai; Y Shao; S Lin; K-Y Xiong; W-S Chen; Y-Y Li; J-L Yi; L Zhang; G Tan; J Tang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  The effects of strabismus on quality of life in adults.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Penny A Kirgis; Elizabeth A Bradley; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Development of a quality-of-life questionnaire for adults with strabismus.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Elizabeth A Bradley; Stephen R Cole; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; R A Deyo; M Charlson; M N Levine; A Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Psychosocial implications of strabismus surgery in adults.

Authors:  J P Burke; C M Leach; H Davis
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) questionnaire using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Laura Liebermann; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Changes in health-related quality of life 1 year following strabismus surgery.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Successful treatment of diplopia with prism improves health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Improved ocular alignment with adjustable sutures in adults undergoing strabismus surgery.

Authors:  Monica S Zhang; Amy K Hutchinson; Arlene V Drack; Julia Cleveland; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Depressive symptoms associated with poor health-related quality of life in adults with strabismus.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Kemuel L Philbrick; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Quantifying diplopia with a questionnaire.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Laura Liebermann; Sarah R Hatt; Stephen J Smith; David A Leske
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Incorporating Health-related Quality of Life Into the Assessment of Outcome Following Strabismus Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Factors Associated With Failure of Adult Strabismus-20 Questionnaire Scores to Improve Following Strabismus Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Kemuel L Philbrick; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Does strabismus surgery improve quality and mood, and what factors influence this?

Authors:  H B McBain; K A MacKenzie; J Hancox; D G Ezra; G G W Adams; S P Newman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Improvement in patients' quality-of-life following strabismus surgery: evaluation of postoperative outcomes using the Adult Strabismus 20 (AS-20) score.

Authors:  P Glasman; R Cheeseman; V Wong; J Young; J M Durnian
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.