M H J Doff1, A Hoekema, G J Pruim, J J R Huddleston Slater, B Stegenga. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.h.j.doff@kchir.umcg.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized controlled study was to cephalometrically assess possible changes in craniofacial morphology associated with long-term use of an adjustable oral-appliance compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). In addition, we wanted to study the relationship between these possible changes and the degree of mandibular protrusion associated with oral-appliance therapy. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were randomized to oral-appliance therapy and 52 patients to CPAP therapy. At baseline and after follow-up (2.3±0.2 years), a lateral cephalogram of all patients was made in maximum intercuspation to determine relevant cephalometric variables. Both baseline and follow-up cephalograms were traced digitally whereupon cephalometric variables were compared. Changes in craniofacial morphology between the oral-appliance- and CPAP group were evaluated with a linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with CPAP, long-term use of an oral-appliance resulted in small but significant (dental) changes. Overbite and overjet decreased, 1.0 (±1.5)mm and 1.7 (±1.6)mm, respectively. Furthermore we found a retroclination (-2.0 (±2.8)°) of the upper incisors and a proclination (3.7 (±5.4)°) of the lower incisors. Moreover, the lower- and total anterior facial height increased significantly, 0.8 (±1.5)mm and 0.9 (±1.4)mm, respectively. No changes in skeletal variables were found. Linear regression analysis revealed that the decrease in overbite was associated with the mean mandibular protrusion during follow-up (B=-0.029, SE=0.014, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Oral-appliance therapy should be considered as a life long treatment, and there is a risk of craniofacial changes to occur. Therefore, patients treated with an oral-appliance, need a thorough follow-up by a dentist or dental-specialist experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine. Crown
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized controlled study was to cephalometrically assess possible changes in craniofacial morphology associated with long-term use of an adjustable oral-appliance compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). In addition, we wanted to study the relationship between these possible changes and the degree of mandibular protrusion associated with oral-appliance therapy. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were randomized to oral-appliance therapy and 52 patients to CPAP therapy. At baseline and after follow-up (2.3±0.2 years), a lateral cephalogram of all patients was made in maximum intercuspation to determine relevant cephalometric variables. Both baseline and follow-up cephalograms were traced digitally whereupon cephalometric variables were compared. Changes in craniofacial morphology between the oral-appliance- and CPAP group were evaluated with a linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with CPAP, long-term use of an oral-appliance resulted in small but significant (dental) changes. Overbite and overjet decreased, 1.0 (±1.5)mm and 1.7 (±1.6)mm, respectively. Furthermore we found a retroclination (-2.0 (±2.8)°) of the upper incisors and a proclination (3.7 (±5.4)°) of the lower incisors. Moreover, the lower- and total anterior facial height increased significantly, 0.8 (±1.5)mm and 0.9 (±1.4)mm, respectively. No changes in skeletal variables were found. Linear regression analysis revealed that the decrease in overbite was associated with the mean mandibular protrusion during follow-up (B=-0.029, SE=0.014, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oral-appliance therapy should be considered as a life long treatment, and there is a risk of craniofacial changes to occur. Therefore, patients treated with an oral-appliance, need a thorough follow-up by a dentist or dental-specialist experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine. Crown
Authors: Michiel H J Doff; Aarnoud Hoekema; Peter J Wijkstra; Johannes H van der Hoeven; James J R Huddleston Slater; Lambert G M de Bont; Boudewijn Stegenga Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Michiel H J Doff; Steffanie K B Veldhuis; Aarnoud Hoekema; James J R Huddleston Slater; P J Wijkstra; Lambert G M de Bont; Boudewijn Stegenga Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Cristina V Perez; Reny de Leeuw; Jeffrey P Okeson; Charles R Carlson; Hsin-Fang Li; Heather M Bush; Donald A Falace Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Kannan Ramar; Leslie C Dort; Sheri G Katz; Christopher J Lettieri; Christopher G Harrod; Sherene M Thomas; Ronald D Chervin Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Kate Sutherland; Olivier M Vanderveken; Hiroko Tsuda; Marie Marklund; Frederic Gagnadoux; Clete A Kushida; Peter A Cistulli Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Andrea Rossi; Antonino Lo Giudice; Camilla Di Pardo; Alberto Teodoro Valentini; Francesca Marradi; Nicola Vanacore; Cristina Grippaudo Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2021-05-08