Literature DB >> 20831298

Comparative effectiveness research and personalized medicine: catalyzing or colliding?

Robert S Epstein1, J Russell Teagarden.   

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is generating intense attention as interest grows in finding new and better drug technology assessment processes. The federal government is supporting the expansion of CER through funding made available in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) and by establishing the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. At the same time, personalized medicine is generating debate about its place in clinical medicine, and so, naturally, how CER can or cannot play a role in personalized medicine is part of these debates. At the heart of the debate around the role of CER in personalized medicine is the nature of personalized medicine and how it fits within contemporary clinical research concepts. We maintain in this article that CER can serve to catalyze personalized medicine, but we recognize that, for this to happen, researchers will need to embrace new data sources and new analytic approaches. We also recognize that drug technology assessment processes will have to undergo necessary adaptations to accommodate CER as configured for personalized medicine, and that clinicians will need to be educated appropriately and provided access to decision-support systems through health information technology to use the information coming from this research. To illustrate our argument, we describe two ongoing CER studies funded and managed in the private sector evaluating personalized medicine interventions that have important clinical and financial implications. One of the studies investigates the clinical and financial effects of pharmacogenomic testing for warfarin as prescribed in conditions of typical practice settings. The other study is also set in community practice settings and compares cardiovascular outcomes of patients receiving clopidogrel who are extensive metabolizer phenotypes for the cytochrome P450 2C19 hepatic isoenzyme with all patients receiving prasugrel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831298     DOI: 10.2165/11535830-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

1.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Daniel B Stryer; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The human genome and translational research: how much evidence is enough?

Authors:  Janet Woodcock
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change.

Authors:  Bryan R Luce; Judith M Kramer; Steven N Goodman; Jason T Connor; Sean Tunis; Danielle Whicher; J Sanford Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events.

Authors:  Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prospective dosing of warfarin based on cytochrome P-450 2C9 genotype.

Authors:  Deepak Voora; Charles Eby; Mark W Linder; Paul E Milligan; Bonny L Bukaveckas; Howard L McLeod; William Maloney; John Clohisy; R Steven Burnett; Leonard Grosso; Susan K Gatchel; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Association between CYP2C9 genetic variants and anticoagulation-related outcomes during warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell K Higashi; David L Veenstra; L Midori Kondo; Ann K Wittkowsky; Sengkeo L Srinouanprachanh; Fred M Farin; Allan E Rettie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism.

Authors:  Zeruesenay Desta; Xiaojiong Zhao; Jae-Gook Shin; David A Flockhart
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy.

Authors:  Alan R Shuldiner; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Kevin P Bliden; Amish Gandhi; Kathleen Ryan; Richard B Horenstein; Coleen M Damcott; Ruth Pakyz; Udaya S Tantry; Quince Gibson; Toni I Pollin; Wendy Post; Afshin Parsa; Braxton D Mitchell; Nauder Faraday; William Herzog; Paul A Gurbel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Genetic determinants of response to warfarin during initial anticoagulation.

Authors:  Ute I Schwarz; Marylyn D Ritchie; Yuki Bradford; Chun Li; Scott M Dudek; Amy Frye-Anderson; Richard B Kim; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Comparative effectiveness research and genomic medicine: an evolving partnership for 21st century medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Eugene C Rich; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Steven M Teutsch; John Niederhuber
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Kathleen J Ramos; Ranjani Somayaji; David P Nichols; Christopher H Goss
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Perspectives on comparative effectiveness research: views from diverse constituencies.

Authors:  Dave Nellesen; Howard G Birnbaum; Paul E Greenberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (sixth and seventh editions) for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk-stratification method.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Tianyu Li; Karthik Devarajan; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Clinical implementation of germ line cancer pharmacogenetic variants during the next-generation sequencing era.

Authors:  N K Gillis; J N Patel; F Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Personalized Medicine's Bottleneck: Diagnostic Test Evidence and Reimbursement.

Authors:  Joshua P Cohen; Abigail E Felix
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-04-04

Review 7.  Innovative payer engagement strategies: will the convergence lead to better value creation in personalized medicine?

Authors:  Ildar Akhmetov; Rostyslav V Bubnov
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Personalized medicine and comparative effectiveness research in an era of fixed budgets.

Authors:  Paul M Brown
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.543

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.