Literature DB >> 20828989

Comparison of the stability of bioabsorbable and titanium osteosynthesis materials for rigid internal fixation in orthognathic surgery. A prospective randomized controlled study in 101 patients with 192 osteotomies.

V Tuovinen1, R Suuronen, M Teittinen, P Nurmenniemi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of rigid internal fixation in orthognathic surgery with either bioabsorbable or titanium osteosynthesis. Orthognathic surgery was performed on 101 patients. Bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy was performed on 55 patients using bioabsorbable osteosynthesis in 26 and titanium osteosynthesis in 29 patients. Le Fort I osteotomy was performed on 28 patients with bioabsorbable and titanium osteosynthesis in 17 and 11 patients, respectively. Bimaxillary osteotomies were performed on 18 patients (8 were fixated with bioabsorbable and 10 with titanium osteosynthesis). Poly-70L/30DL-lactide copolymer (PLDLA) consisting of 70% L-lactide and 30% DL-lactide was used as the bioabsorbable osteosynthesis material. These plates and screws were compared with corresponding titanium materials. Statistically a clear relapse tendency was seen in skeletal measurements in all patient groups but without clinical importance. Radiological follow-up time was at least 18.3 months and clinical follow-up time at least 6.3 years. The materials used did not cause any adverse reaction except in three cases, one in the bioabsorbable group and two in the titanium group where fistula in connection with the osteosynthesis material was noted resulting in removal of the materials.
Copyright © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20828989     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

Review 2.  Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Gareb; N B van Bakelen; G J Buijs; J Jansma; J G A M de Visscher; Th J M Hoppenreijs; J E Bergsma; B van Minnen; B Stegenga; R R M Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Relapse and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) as postoperative complication in skeletal class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas Gosla Reddy; Ashutosh Dixit; Padmanidhi Agarwal; Rebecca Chowdhry; Ashi Chug
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Complications of absorbable fixation in maxillofacial surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liya Yang; Meibang Xu; Xiaolei Jin; Jiajie Xu; Jianjian Lu; Chao Zhang; Tian Tian; Li Teng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosyntheses in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B van Bakelen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.612

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.