Literature DB >> 20828791

The efficacy of bisphosphonates in the prevention of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral-nonhip fractures in osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Jeroen P Jansen1, Gert J D Bergman, Jasper Huels, Melvin Olson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of available bisphosphonate therapies regarding the prevention of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral-nonhip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
METHODS: Eight randomized placebo controlled trials investigating the effects of zoledronic acid (1 study), alendronate (3), ibandronate (1), risedronate (2), and etidronate (1) in terms of fractures with a follow-up of 3 years (or 2 years if used for registration purposes) were identified with a systematic literature search. The endpoints of interest were morphometric vertebral fractures, hip fractures, and nonvertebral-nonhip fractures. Results of all trials were analyzed simultaneously with a Bayesian network meta-analysis by which the relative treatment effect of 1 intervention to another can be obtained in the absence of head-to-head evidence. Given the estimated treatment effects and their uncertainty, the Bayesian approach allowed for calculations of the probability of which bisphosphonate is best in terms of overall fracture reductions by weighting the impact of each by type of fracture on costs, quality of life, and incidence.
RESULTS: There is a 79% probability that zoledronic acid shows the greatest reduction in vertebral fractures of all bisphophonates compared. Zoledronic acid showed a relative risk (RR) of 0.30 (95% Credible Interval 0.23-0.37) relative to placebo, an RR of 0.55 (0.41-0.76) relative to alendronate, an RR of 0.50 (0.36-0.70) relative to risedronate, and an RR of 0.58 (0.37-0.92) relative to ibandronate. Regarding hip fractures, there is a 47% probability that zoledronic acid shows the greatest risk reduction, followed by alendronate (36%) and risedronate (11%). RRs of zoledronic acid relative to placebo, alendronate, and risedronate were 0.58 (0.41-0.82), 0.95 (0.54-1.68), and 0.73 (0.37-1.44), respectively. Risedronate showed the greatest reduction in nonvertebral-nonhip fractures, followed by zoledronic acid. The RR of zoledronic acid relative to risedronate was 1.28 (0.87-1.90). Overall, there was a 94% probability that zoledronic acid showed the greatest reduction in any fracture. Weighting the impact of the different type of fractures by incidence, cost, or quality of life showed similar results.
CONCLUSION: Of the available bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, zoledronic acid has the highest probability of offering the best overall fracture protection.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20828791     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  38 in total

Review 1.  Bisphosphonates for periprosthetic bone loss after joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  T Lin; S-G Yan; X-Z Cai; Z-M Ying
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Medical management in the acute hip fracture patient: a comprehensive review for the internist.

Authors:  Laura Bateman; Srinivas Vuppala; Patricia Porada; William Carter; Charitraheen Baijnath; Kabeer Burman; Ryan Lee; Jodie Hargus
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

Review 3.  The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Rzewuska; Manuela Ferreira; Andrew J McLachlan; Gustavo C Machado; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Emerging therapeutic opportunities for skeletal restoration.

Authors:  Masanobu Kawai; Ulrike I Mödder; Sundeep Khosla; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Bisphosphonates for the preservation of periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M Shi; L Chen; Z Xin; Y Wang; W Wang; S Yan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in non-malignant bone disease.

Authors:  Peter K Wong; Gelsomina L Borromeo; John D Wark
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 7.  Conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  A Slavici; M Rauschmann; C Fleege
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Aiwen Xing; Michael J Kofler; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  The relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  Robert B Hopkins; Ron Goeree; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; Feng Xie; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.