PURPOSE: It is well known that CPT-11 (irinotecan) is biotransformed to its active metabolite, SN-38, by carboxylesterase in the liver and other tissues. However, little is known about its pharmacokinetics (PK) when administered intraperitoneally. The aim of our study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CPT-11 and SN-38 following the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of CPT-11. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data obtained from 16 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with peritoneal seeding were used. Administered doses ranged from 50 to 250 mg/m(2). To measure CPT-11 and SN-38 levels, we collected samples of peritoneal fluid, plasma and urine 0, 0.5, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 8, 12, 25.5, 49 and 56 h after IP infusion. Several multicompartmental pharmacokinetic models were tested for CPT-11 and SN-38 in the sampled peritoneal fluid, plasma and urine. NONMEM ver. 6 was used throughout the model-building process. RESULTS: Peak concentrations were achieved earlier for peritoneal SN-38 than for plasma SN-38. The apparent metabolic clearance of peritoneal and plasma CPT-11 to peritoneal and plasma SN-38 accounted for 0.2 and 7.3% of the total clearance of peritoneal and plasma CPT-11, respectively. The typical values of steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) (46.6 L/m(2)), inter-compartment clearance (6.70 L/h/m(2)) and clearance (16.0 L/h/m(2)) for plasma CPT-11 were estimated in a two-compartment PK model. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a small fraction of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 was metabolized in situ to active SN-38 and that the Vss of plasma CPT-11 following IP administration in our patient cohort was lower than that estimated in previous reports following the intravenous administration of CPT-11.
PURPOSE: It is well known that CPT-11 (irinotecan) is biotransformed to its active metabolite, SN-38, by carboxylesterase in the liver and other tissues. However, little is known about its pharmacokinetics (PK) when administered intraperitoneally. The aim of our study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CPT-11 and SN-38 following the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of CPT-11. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data obtained from 16 gastric adenocarcinomapatients with peritoneal seeding were used. Administered doses ranged from 50 to 250 mg/m(2). To measure CPT-11 and SN-38 levels, we collected samples of peritoneal fluid, plasma and urine 0, 0.5, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 8, 12, 25.5, 49 and 56 h after IP infusion. Several multicompartmental pharmacokinetic models were tested for CPT-11 and SN-38 in the sampled peritoneal fluid, plasma and urine. NONMEM ver. 6 was used throughout the model-building process. RESULTS: Peak concentrations were achieved earlier for peritoneal SN-38 than for plasma SN-38. The apparent metabolic clearance of peritoneal and plasma CPT-11 to peritoneal and plasma SN-38 accounted for 0.2 and 7.3% of the total clearance of peritoneal and plasma CPT-11, respectively. The typical values of steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) (46.6 L/m(2)), inter-compartment clearance (6.70 L/h/m(2)) and clearance (16.0 L/h/m(2)) for plasma CPT-11 were estimated in a two-compartment PK model. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a small fraction of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 was metabolized in situ to active SN-38 and that the Vss of plasma CPT-11 following IP administration in our patient cohort was lower than that estimated in previous reports following the intravenous administration of CPT-11.
Authors: Moon Ki Choi; Byung-Jin Ahn; Dong-Seok Yim; Young Suk Park; Sung Kim; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Hyung Noh; Jin Seok Heo; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2010-03-06 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: R H Mathijssen; R J van Alphen; J Verweij; W J Loos; K Nooter; G Stoter; A Sparreboom Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Ragot; P Marquet; F Lachâtre; A Rousseau; E Lacassie; J M Gaulier; J L Dupuy; G Lachâtre Journal: J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl Date: 1999-12-24
Authors: A Sparreboom; M J de Jonge; P de Bruijn; E Brouwer; K Nooter; W J Loos; R J van Alphen; R H Mathijssen; G Stoter; J Verweij Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: G G Chabot; D Abigerges; G Catimel; S Culine; M de Forni; J M Extra; M Mahjoubi; P Hérait; J P Armand; R Bugat Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mazin F Al-Kasspooles; Stephen K Williamson; David Henry; Jahna Howell; Fengui Niu; Charles J Decedue; Katherine F Roby Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Zheng Liu; Jennifer H Martin; Winston Liauw; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Emma Link; Anetta Matera; Michael Thompson; Michael Jefford; Rod J Hicks; Carleen Cullinane; Athena Hatzimihalis; Ian Campbell; Simone Crowley; Phillip J Beale; Christos S Karapetis; Timothy Price; Mathew E Burge; Michael Michael Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Femke M de Man; Andrew K L Goey; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Nadine Leonie de Boer; Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof; Eva V E Madsen; Marjolein Diepeveen; Esther van Meerten; Ruben A G van Eerden; Femke M de Man; Rachida Bouamar; Stijn L W Koolen; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Checca Bakkers; Koen P Rovers; Geert-Jan M Creemers; Maarten J Deenen; Onno W Kranenburg; Alexander Constantinides; Ron H J Mathijssen; Cornelis Verhoef; Jacobus W A Burger Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-08 Impact factor: 2.692