Literature DB >> 20827468

Comparison of separation performance of laser-ablated and wet-etched microfluidic devices.

Christopher A Baker1, Rayford Bulloch, Michael G Roper.   

Abstract

Laser ablation of glass allows for production of microfluidic devices without the need for hydrofluoric acid and photolithography. The goal of this study was to compare the separation performance of microfluidic devices produced using a low-cost laser ablation system and conventional wet etching. During laser ablation, cracking of the glass substrate was prevented by heating the glass to 300 °C. A range of laser energy densities was found to produce channel depths ranging from 4 to 35 μm and channel widths from 118 to 162 μm. The electroosmotic flow velocity was lower in laser-ablated devices, 0.110±0.005 cm s(-1), as compared to wet-etched microfluidic chips, 0.126±0.003 cm s(-1). Separations of both small and large molecules performed on both wet- and laser-ablated devices were compared by examining limits of detection, theoretical plate count, and peak asymmetry. Laser-induced fluorescence detection limits were 10 pM fluorescein for both types of devices. Laser-ablated and wet-etched microfluidic chips had reproducible migration times with ≤ 2.8% relative standard deviation and peak asymmetries ranged from 1.0 to 1.8. Numbers of theoretical plates were between 2.8- and 6.2-fold higher on the wet-etched devices compared to laser-ablated devices. Nevertheless, resolution between small and large analytes was accomplished, which indicates that laser ablation may find an application in pedagogical studies of electrophoresis or microfluidic devices, or in settings where hydrofluoric acid cannot be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20827468      PMCID: PMC3026912          DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4144-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  24 in total

1.  DNA fragment sizing by single molecule detection in submicrometer-sized closed fluidic channels.

Authors:  Mathieu Foquet; Jonas Korlach; Warren Zipfel; Watt W Webb; Harold G Craighead
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Microchip-based purification of DNA from biological samples.

Authors:  Michael C Breadmore; Kelley A Wolfe; Imee G Arcibal; Wayne K Leung; Dana Dickson; Braden C Giordano; Mary E Power; Jerome P Ferrance; Sanford H Feldman; Pamela M Norris; James P Landers
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Jessamine Ng Lee; Cheolmin Park; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Microfluidic large-scale integration.

Authors:  Todd Thorsen; Sebastian J Maerkl; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Parallel picoliter rt-PCR assays using microfluidics.

Authors:  Joshua S Marcus; W French Anderson; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Three-dimensional hole drilling of silica glass from the rear surface with femtosecond laser pulses.

Authors:  Y Li; K Itoh; W Watanabe; K Yamada; D Kuroda; J Nishii; Y Jiang
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  The chemistrode: a droplet-based microfluidic device for stimulation and recording with high temporal, spatial, and chemical resolution.

Authors:  Delai Chen; Wenbin Du; Ying Liu; Weishan Liu; Andrey Kuznetsov; Felipe E Mendez; Louis H Philipson; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Surface characterization of laser-ablated polymers used for microfluidics.

Authors:  D L Pugmire; E A Waddell; R Haasch; M J Tarlov; L E Locascio
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Multiplexed real-time polymerase chain reaction on a digital microfluidic platform.

Authors:  Zhishan Hua; Jeremy L Rouse; Allen E Eckhardt; Vijay Srinivasan; Vamsee K Pamula; Wiley A Schell; Jonathan L Benton; Thomas G Mitchell; Michael G Pollack
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simultaneous monitoring of insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide secretion from islets of Langerhans on a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Anna R Lomasney; Lian Yi; Michael G Roper
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Fabrication and Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review.

Authors:  Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu; Cristina Chircov; Alexandra Cătălina Bîrcă; Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Ultrafast z-scanning for high-efficiency laser micro-machining.

Authors:  Ting-Hsuan Chen; Romain Fardel; Craig B Arnold
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 17.782

4.  Study of the Fabrication Technology of Hybrid Microfluidic Biochips for Label-Free Detection of Proteins.

Authors:  Nikita Sitkov; Tatiana Zimina; Alexey Kolobov; Evgeny Sevostyanov; Valentina Trushlyakova; Viktor Luchinin; Alexander Krasichkov; Oleg Markelov; Michael Galagudza; Dmitry Kaplun
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.