Alan Flisher1, Katherine Sorsdahl, John Joska. 1. Formerly of Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) is a widely used instrument to assess the service needs for people with a severe mental illness. No reliability data are available for its use in South Africa. METHOD: Interrater and test-retest reliability were documented for a sub-sample of 194 patients participating in a needs assessment study among people receiving mental health services. Initially, the CAN was administered by one field worker, while another observed and also made ratings. The participant was then re-interviewed approximately one week after the initial interview. RESULTS: With the exception of 'psychotic symptoms' (κ = -0.4) and 'looking after home' (κ = 0.008), Cohen's κ coefficients for interrater reliability ranged from 0.150 to 0.760 for Section 1 of the CAN. Test-retest reliabilities for Section 1 resulted in moderate to substantial agreement, with Cohen's κ coefficient ranging from 0.25 to 0.81. High correlations were reported for the test-retest reliabilities of the remaining sections of the CAN (r = 0.719-0.845). However, the figures for the interrater reliabilities were lower and more variable (r = -0.082-0.408). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that with additional interviewer training, the CAN is a relatively reliable instrument for assessing the needs of youths with severe mental illness.
BACKGROUND: The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) is a widely used instrument to assess the service needs for people with a severe mental illness. No reliability data are available for its use in South Africa. METHOD: Interrater and test-retest reliability were documented for a sub-sample of 194 patients participating in a needs assessment study among people receiving mental health services. Initially, the CAN was administered by one field worker, while another observed and also made ratings. The participant was then re-interviewed approximately one week after the initial interview. RESULTS: With the exception of 'psychotic symptoms' (κ = -0.4) and 'looking after home' (κ = 0.008), Cohen's κ coefficients for interrater reliability ranged from 0.150 to 0.760 for Section 1 of the CAN. Test-retest reliabilities for Section 1 resulted in moderate to substantial agreement, with Cohen's κ coefficient ranging from 0.25 to 0.81. High correlations were reported for the test-retest reliabilities of the remaining sections of the CAN (r = 0.719-0.845). However, the figures for the interrater reliabilities were lower and more variable (r = -0.082-0.408). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that with additional interviewer training, the CAN is a relatively reliable instrument for assessing the needs of youths with severe mental illness.
Authors: Andrew Tomita; Jonathan K Burns; Howard King; Joy Noel Baumgartner; Glen P Davis; Sisanda Mtshemla; Siphumelele Nene; Ezra Susser Journal: Soc Work Health Care Date: 2016-01-05
Authors: Colin A Beckworth; Robert Anguyo; Francis Cranmer Kyakulaga; Stephen K Lwanga; Joseph J Valadez Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Goodman Sibeko; Henk Temmingh; Sumaya Mall; Peter Williams-Ashman; Graham Thornicroft; Ezra S Susser; Crick Lund; Dan J Stein; Peter D Milligan Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2017-11-09