Literature DB >> 20825874

Tetanus Quick Stick as an applicable and cost-effective test in assessment of immunity status.

Hamid Reza Hatamabadi1, Ali Abdalvand, Saeed Safari, Hamid Kariman, Ali Arhami Dolatabadi, Ali Shahrami, Hossein Alimohammadi, Mostafa Hosseini.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tetanus vaccine and immunoglobulin administration are challenging decisions mostly because of the fact that the current protocol for immunization against tetanus is based on 2 variables: the vaccination status of the patient and the nature of wound and its exposure. To solve this problem, Tetanus Quick Stick (TQS; Nephrotek Laboratory, Rungis, France), an immunochromatographic dipstick test, was developed to determine the tetanus immunity of the patients. The aim of this present study was to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values and cost-effectiveness of TQS in the emergency department (ED) setting.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 200 patients presenting to our ED. Information including demographic information, tetanus immunization status, wound description, and the preventive measures taken by the emergency physician were gathered by a preeducated nurse. Tetanus Quick Stick test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were performed as the standard diagnostic test by an emergency physician and a laboratory technician, respectively; and results of the 2 techniques were compared. RESULT: Overall, tetanus vaccine was administered to 141(70.5%) patients and immunoglobulin to 105 (52.5%) patients. The analysis revealed 88.1% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity for the TQS test. The positive and negative predictive values of TQS test were 99.3% and 66.1%, respectively. Our analysis is also showed a significant decrease in cost when TQS was applied for patients with dirty, tetanus prone wounds or injuries and unknown or incomplete vaccination history (€ 9.48 versus € 12.1).
CONCLUSION: This study revealed TQS test to be appropriate and cost-effective for ED use especially in evaluating patients who do not remember or cannot give their tetanus immunization history.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825874     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  10 in total

Review 1.  Economic Evidence and Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 2.  Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Paul K Drain; Emily P Hyle; Farzad Noubary; Kenneth A Freedberg; Douglas Wilson; William R Bishai; William Rodriguez; Ingrid V Bassett
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions.

Authors:  Marcus A Moore; Kimberly R Barber; Todd Britt
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2012-02-09

4.  Effectiveness and cost of quick diagnostic tests to determine tetanus immunity in patients with a wound in French emergency departments.

Authors:  Dieynaba S N'Diaye; Michaël Schwarzinger; Dorothée Obach; Julien Poissy; Sophie Matheron; Enrique Casalino; Yazdan Yazdanpanah
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Immunization Catch-Up for Newly Arrived Migrants in France: A Cross-Sectional Study among French General Practitioners.

Authors:  Sohela Moussaoui; Anne Marie Aurousseau; Sylvain Nappez; Julian Cornaglia; Gaylord Delobre; Sophie Blanchi; Louise Luan; Stéphanie Vandentorren; Olivier Bouchaud; Odile Launay; Louise Nutte; Roxane Liard; Mariela Skendi; Matthieu Mechain; Nicolas Vignier
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-21

6.  Clinician awareness of tetanus-diphtheria vaccination in trauma patients: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Yoon; Sung-Woo Moon; Sung-Hyuk Choi; Young-Duck Cho; Jung-Youn Kim; Young Ho Kwak
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Knowledge of Emergency Medicine Residents in Relation to Prevention of Tetanus.

Authors:  Hojjat Derakhshanfar; Behrooz Hashemi; Mohammad Manouchehrifar; Parvin Kashani; Mohammad Mehdi Forouzanfar
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2014

8.  The use of tetanus post-exposure prophylaxis guidelines by general practitioners and emergency departments in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Robine Donken; Nicoline van der Maas; Corien Swaan; Tjerk Wiersma; Margreet Te Wierik; Susan Hahné; Hester de Melker
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  A toe that pointed the wrong way: An unusual presentation of tetanus.

Authors:  Krishnarpan Chatterjee; Anirban Ghosh; Rimi Som Sengupta
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Quick Stick for Identifying Traumatic Patients in Need of Tetanus Prophylaxis; a Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Iraj Golikhatir; Seyed Hossein Montazer; Nabiollah Bagheri; Fatemeh Jahanian; Farzad Bozorgi; Seyed Mohammad Hosseininejad; Hamed Amini Ahidashti
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-04-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.