Literature DB >> 20825870

Abdominal compressions do not achieve similar survival rates compared with chest compressions: an experimental study.

Theodoros Xanthos1, Eleni Bassiakou, Ismene Dontas, Ioannis Pantazopoulos, Pavlos Lelovas, Evangelia Kouskouni, Lila Papadimitriou.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate whether abdominal compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would result in similar survival rates and neurologic outcome than chest compression CPR in a swine model of cardiac arrest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty Landrace/Large White piglets were randomized into 2 groups: group A (n = 20) was resuscitated using chest compression CPR, and group B (n = 20) was resuscitated with abdominal compression CPR. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with a pacemaker catheter, and animals were left untreated for 8 minutes. Abdominal and chest compressions were applied with a mechanical compressor. Defibrillation was then attempted.
RESULTS: Neuron-specific enolase and S-100 levels were significantly higher in group B. Ten animals survived for 24 hours in group A in contrast to only 3 animals in group B (P < .05). Neurologic alertness score was worse in group B compared with group A.
CONCLUSION: Abdominal compression CPR does not improve survival and neurologic outcome in this swine model of cardiac arrest and CPR.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825870     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  1 in total

1.  Standard versus Abdominal Lifting and Compression CPR.

Authors:  Sisen Zhang; Qing Liu; Shupeng Han; Ziran Zhang; Yan Zhang; Yahua Liu; Jing Li; Lixiang Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.629

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.