Literature DB >> 20825759

Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique.

Anastasios D Asimakopoulos1, Filippo Annino, Alejandro D'Orazio, Clovis Fraga T Pereira, Camille Mugnier, Jean-Luc Hoepffner, Thierry Piechaud, Richard Gaston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Puboprostatic ligament preservation has been proposed as a method to accelerate continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, these ligaments present anatomic continuity with the bladder, and there must be interruption at some point to expose the prostatourethral junction.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the surgical steps of pubovesical complex (PVC)-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) and present the preliminary results of our technique. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty PVC-sparing RALP procedures were performed in patients <60 yr with clinically localised prostate cancer between 2007 and 2009 by the same surgeon. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The principles of bladder neck preservation, tension and energy-free dissection of the bundles as well as seminal vesicle sparing are applied. Ventrally, a plane of dissection is developed between the detrusor apron and the prostate. The soft connective tissue between Santorini's plexus and the prostate is blandly dissected, leaving the plexus intact and in place. MEASUREMENTS: The rates and location of positive surgical margins (PSM) as well as functional outcomes are presented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Three of 30 patients (10%) had a PSM (two apical margins and one on the left posterolateral side). At catheter removal, 24 of 30 patients (80%) were dry (0 pads), and 6 of 30 patients (20%) needed one security pad. After 3 mo, 22 of 30 patients (73%) presented an International Index of Erectile Function score >17 (with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors). Thirteen of 22 potent patients had an Erection Hardness Score of 3, and 9 of 22 patients had a score of 4. Small sample size, low mean age of enrolled patients (52 yr), and the absence of diseases that could impair the continence and potency recovery are some of the limitations of the study. Moreover, it is difficult to quantify the effect of each applied continence-sparing technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The holistic preservation of the PVC during RALP is technically feasible. It leads towards an absolute preservation of the periprostatic anatomy that may enhance early functional outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm our results. (c) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825759     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  19 in total

1.  Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Jong Jin Oh; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Natural orifice (NOTES) transurethral sutureless radical prostatectomy with thulium laser support: first patient report.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ute Walcher; Andre P Nicklas; Axel S Merseburger; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Roberto Miano; Nicola Di Lorenzo; Enrico Spera; Giuseppe Vespasiani; Camille Mugnier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Luca Topazio; Michele De Angelis; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Andrea Fuschi; Filippo Annino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Ligation-free technique for dorsal vascular complex control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center experience from China.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Abai Xu; Binshen Chen; Shaobo Zheng; Yawen Xu; Hulin Li; Bingkun Li; Peng Huang; Yiming Zhang; Yukun Ge; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation and Posterior Urethral Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Urinary Continence.

Authors:  Youn Chul You; Tae Hyo Kim; Gyung Tak Sung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-01-25

7.  Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for a single experienced surgeon: comparison with simultaneous laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ja Yoon Ku; Hong Koo Ha
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.400

8.  Dorsal vein complex preserving technique for intrafascial nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Akio Hoshi; Yukio Usui; Yuuki Shimizu; Tetsuro Tomonaga; Masayoshi Kawakami; Nobuyuki Nakajima; Kazuya Hanai; Takeshi Nomoto; Toshiro Terachi
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Bladder neck preservation during classic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - point of technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Piotr L Chłosta; Tomasz Drewa; Jarosław Jaskulski; Jakub Dobruch; John Varkarakis; Andrzej Borówka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective 2-year single-surgeon experience with 171 cases.

Authors:  Tito Palmela Leitão; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Eric Mandron
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.