Literature DB >> 20825541

Effects of inbreeding on aversive learning in Drosophila.

V Nepoux1, C R Haag, T J Kawecki.   

Abstract

Inbreeding adversely affects life history traits as well as various other fitness-related traits, but its effect on cognitive traits remains largely unexplored, despite their importance to fitness of many animals under natural conditions. We studied the effects of inbreeding on aversive learning (avoidance of an odour previously associated with mechanical shock) in multiple inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster derived from a natural population through up to 12 generations of sib mating. Whereas the strongly inbred lines after 12 generations of inbreeding (0.75<F<0.93) consistently showed reduced egg-to-adult viability (on average by 28%), the reduction in learning performance varied among assays (average=18% reduction), being most pronounced for intermediate conditioning intensity. Furthermore, moderately inbred lines (F=0.38) showed no detectable decline in learning performance, but still had reduced egg-to-adult viability, which indicates that overall inbreeding effects on learning are mild. Learning performance varied among strongly inbred lines, indicating the presence of segregating variance for learning in the base population. However, the learning performance of some inbred lines matched that of outbred flies, supporting the dominance rather than the overdominance model of inbreeding depression for this trait. Across the inbred lines, learning performance was positively correlated with the egg-to-adult viability. This positive genetic correlation contradicts a trade-off observed in previous selection experiments and suggests that much of the genetic variation for learning is owing to pleiotropic effects of genes affecting functions related to survival. These results suggest that genetic variation that affects learning specifically (rather than pleiotropically through general physiological condition) is either low or mostly due to alleles with additive (semi-dominant) effects.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825541     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02094.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  Inbred burying beetles suffer fitness costs from making poor decisions.

Authors:  Jon Richardson; Pauline Comin; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Male cognitive performance declines in the absence of sexual selection.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Influence of Inbreeding on Female Mate Choice in Two Species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Amberle A McKee; Shanna M Newton; Ashley J R Carter
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.309

4.  Large-scale assessment of olfactory preferences and learning in Drosophila melanogaster: behavioral and genetic components.

Authors:  Elisabetta Versace; Julia Reisenberger
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Quantitative genetics of learning ability and resistance to stress in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Virginie Nepoux; Aurélie Babin; Christoph Haag; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Arnaud Le Rouzic
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Independent natural genetic variation of punishment- versus relief-memory.

Authors:  Mirjam Appel; Claus-Jürgen Scholz; Samet Kocabey; Sinead Savage; Christian König; Ayse Yarali
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Adaptation to fluctuating environments in a selection experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Olga I Kubrak; Sören Nylin; Thomas Flatt; Dick R Nässel; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Generation-based life table analysis reveals manifold effects of inbreeding on the population fitness in Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Lu Peng; Mingmin Zou; Nana Ren; Miao Xie; Liette Vasseur; Yifan Yang; Weiyi He; Guang Yang; Geoff M Gurr; Youming Hou; Shijun You; Minsheng You
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Heterozygosity testing and multiplex DNA panel screening as a potential tool to monitor health and inbreeding in a small, closed dog population.

Authors:  S F A Keijser; H Fieten; M Vos-Loohuis; C J Piek; H Anderson; J Donner; I Scholten; M Nielen; J W Hesselink; F G van Steenbeek
Journal:  Canine Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-28

10.  Differential side-effects of Bacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticide on non-target Drosophila flies.

Authors:  Aurélie Babin; Marie-Paule Nawrot-Esposito; Armel Gallet; Jean-Luc Gatti; Marylène Poirié
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.