Literature DB >> 20825369

Patient satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: can we rely on proxies?

K H Stricker1, O Kimberger, L Brunner, H U Rothen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether next of kin can be addressed as proxy to assess patients' satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: Prospective observational multicentre study. Two hundred and thirty-five patients with an ICU length of stay of ≥2 days and 266 of their adult next of kin participated. Patient satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire, distributed upon discharge from an ICU and compared with next of kin's answers. The possible range of answers was 0-100, with higher numbers indicating higher satisfaction. The main outcome measure was the extent of agreement between patients' satisfaction with care and the ratings of their next of kin.
RESULTS: Patients were most satisfied concerning physicians' competence (86.7±16.3), while least satisfaction was observed for the management of agitation and restlessness (78.2±23.5). There was no significant difference between next of kin's and patients' ratings. Agreement between patients and proxies was the highest concerning overall satisfaction (Cohen's κ 0.40) and the lowest for coordination of care (0.24). Spouses/partners had a higher agreement with the patients' ratings than other proxies.
CONCLUSIONS: If the patient is unable to rate his satisfaction with care in the ICU, next of kin may be taken as an appropriate surrogate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, Reg No: NTC 00890513.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20825369     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02293.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  11 in total

1.  Family-centered ICU care may be good for everyone.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Hanne I Jensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Schwarzkopf; Susanne Behrend; Helga Skupin; Isabella Westermann; Niels C Riedemann; Rüdiger Pfeifer; Albrecht Günther; Otto W Witte; Konrad Reinhart; Christiane S Hartog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The Association of Proxy Care Engagement with Proxy Reports of Patient Experience and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Roee Gutman; Nancy L Keating; Vincent Mor; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Defining the Medical Intensive Care Unit in the Words of Patients and Their Family Members: A Freelisting Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine L Auriemma; Sarah M Lyon; Lauren E Strelec; Saida Kent; Frances K Barg; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Effect of intensive care environment on family and patient satisfaction: a before-after study.

Authors:  Irene P Jongerden; Arjen J Slooter; Linda M Peelen; Hester Wessels; Colette M Ram; Jozef Kesecioglu; Margriet M Schneider; Diederik van Dijk
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Differences between Proxy and Patient Assessments of Cancer Care Experiences and Quality Ratings.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Roee Gutman; Nancy L Keating; Vincent Mor; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Concordance of Patient and Caregiver Reports on the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Care.

Authors:  Rachel D Havyer; Michelle van Ryn; Patrick M Wilson; Lauren R Bangerter; Joan M Griffin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Family satisfaction in the trauma and surgical intensive care unit: another important quality measure.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Agustin Alvarez; Yvonne Hojberg; Derek Antoku; Chioma Moneme; Andrew Singleton; Caroline Park; Kazuhide Matsushima
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2019-08-12

9.  Prospective cohort study protocol to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Quality of Trauma Care Patient-Reported Experience Measure (QTAC-PREM).

Authors:  Niklas Bobrovitz; Maria Santana; Theresa Kline; John Kortbeek; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Satisfaction with quality of ICU care for patients and families: the euroQ2 project.

Authors:  Hanne Irene Jensen; Rik T Gerritsen; Matty Koopmans; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Peter E Spronk; Jan G Zijlstra; Helle Ørding
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.