| Literature DB >> 20824985 |
Abstract
Kerala is well-known globally for the unprecedented fertility transition in the Indian subcontinent towards the end of the last century. The state has already reached below-replacement fertility level in the 1990s while the rest of India was experiencing high or mid-level fertility. With this backdrop, an attempt was made in this paper (a) to explore the plausible factors associated with sub-replacement fertility and consequent population momentum in Kerala and (b) to trace their socioeconomic and health policy implications. The underlying factors that led to the fertility transition was explored and discussed in some detail. An enhanced level of human development achieved during the last quarter of the 20th century mainly through developments in social and health sectors, is likely to be the main contributor. Unlike other states in India, there were historical factors as well that functioned as a catalyst for this, such as widespread education and women's empowerment. As an inevitable demographic impact, population growth due to momentum is expected to be very strong in Kerala with an age-structural transition favouring the old. The so-called 'demographic dividend' invoked by the increase of labour-force derived from the youth bulge in the age-structure is being lost in the state due to very limited capital investments and political will. Again, as a direct consequence of population growth, population density in Kerala will take a staggering level of 1,101 persons per sq km in 2026. The ill effects of environmental deterioration and consequent changes in morbidity patterns will have to be dealt with seriously. The very foundations of health policy needs revamping in the light of demographic changes associated with sub-replacement fertility. The tempo of population-ageing is very high in Kerala. The proportion of population aged 60+ years is likely to be 20% in 2026 whereas it will be around 12% only in India. The current level of social and health infrastructure in the state may not be sufficient to cope with the emerging demands of population-ageing since the financial and morbidity burdens of the elderly are already quite high. To conclude, Kerala portrays a typical case of the vagaries of the onset of sub-replacement fertility level in the absence of reasonable structural changes in the economic and health fronts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20824985 PMCID: PMC2965333 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v28i4.6048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Trends in total fertility rates, crude death rate, and infant mortality rate: comparison between India and Kerala, 1981-2007
| Year | India | Kerala |
|---|---|---|
| Birth rate | ||
| 1981 | 33.7 | 26.8 |
| 1991 | 29.5 | 18.3 |
| 1994 | 28.7 | 17.4 |
| 2001 | 25.4 | 17.2 |
| 2005 | 23.8 | 15.0 |
| 2007 | 23.1 | 14.7 |
| Death rate | ||
| 1981 | 12.5 | 6.6 |
| 1991 | 9.8 | 6.0 |
| 1994 | 9.3 | 6.1 |
| 2001 | 8.4 | 6.6 |
| 2005 | 7.6 | 6.4 |
| 2007 | 7.4 | 6.8 |
| Infant mortality rate | ||
| 1981 | 110 | 37 |
| 1991 | 79 | 16 |
| 1994 | 74 | 16 |
| 2001 | 66 | 11 |
| 2005 | 58 | 14 |
| 2007 | 55 | 13 |
| Total fertility rate | ||
| 1981 | 4.5 | 2.8 |
| 1991 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| 1994 | 3.5 | 1.7 |
| 2001 | 3.2 | 1.9 |
| 2006 (NFHS-3) | 2.7 | 1.9 |
Source: Registrar General of India. Reports of the sample registration system, 1981 to 2007. New Delhi: Registrar General of India, and International Institute for Population Sciences. National family health survey (NFHS-3), 2005-2006. Bombay: International Institute for Population Sciences, 2007 (4)
Momentum of population growth in India and Kerala
| Area | NRR | Momentum |
|---|---|---|
| Kerala (1987) | 1.00 | 1.59 |
| India (2019) | 1.01 | 1.34 |
NRR=Net reproduction rate
Momentum-related population growth in Kerala vis-a-vis projected population of India
| Population and density | 2001 | 2021 | 2026 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerala | India | Kerala | India | Kerala | India | |
| Population (million) | 31.8 | 1,039.7 | 39.6 | 1,347.7 | 40.7 | 1,406.2 |
| Population density (sq km) | 860 | 350 | 1,018 | 453 | 1,101 | 472 |