Giovanni Dapri1, Guy Bernard Cadière, Jacques Himpens. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. giovanni@dapri.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common bariatric procedures performed. Dumping syndrome, intolerance to RYGB-induced restriction, and weight loss issues are possible problems bariatric surgeons are confronted with. This study reports the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of laparoscopic reconversion of RYGB to original anatomy (OA) as treatment of these complications. METHODS: Between January 2005 and April 2008, eight patients benefited from laparoscopic reconversion of RYGB to OA. Reason was dumping syndrome without postprandial hypoglycemia (three), intolerance to RYGB-induced restriction (three), too much (one) and too little weight loss (one). Mean weight and body mass index (BMI) at RYGB were 104.7±19.3 kg and 38.7±6 kg/m(2), respectively. Four patients suffered of obesity co-morbidities. Mean time between RYGB and reconversion was 21±18.8 months. Mean weight, BMI, and % excess weight loss at reconversion was 66.8±21.7 kg, 20.1±7 kg/m(2), and 23.7±55%, respectively. The procedure involved dismantling both gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy, reanastomosing gastric pouch to gastric remnant, and proximal alimentary limb end to distal biliary limb end. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 132.2±29.5 min. There were no conversions to open surgery and no early complications. Gastrogastrostomy was performed manually (four) and by linear stapler (four), and jejunojejunostomy by linear stapler (eight). Mean hospital stay was 7.7±3.5 days. After a mean follow-up of 18.3±9.2 months, two patients continued to further lose weight, two patients maintained the same weight, and four patients presented weight regain. Gastroesophageal reflux disease appeared in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reconversion of RYGB to OA is feasible and safe. Dumping syndrome and intolerance to RYGB-induced restriction are resolved. The anatomy remains one of the aspects besides nutritional and psychological factors in cases of reconversion for weight issues.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most common bariatric procedures performed. Dumping syndrome, intolerance to RYGB-induced restriction, and weight loss issues are possible problems bariatric surgeons are confronted with. This study reports the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of laparoscopic reconversion of RYGB to original anatomy (OA) as treatment of these complications. METHODS: Between January 2005 and April 2008, eight patients benefited from laparoscopic reconversion of RYGB to OA. Reason was dumping syndrome without postprandial hypoglycemia (three), intolerance to RYGB-induced restriction (three), too much (one) and too little weight loss (one). Mean weight and body mass index (BMI) at RYGB were 104.7±19.3 kg and 38.7±6 kg/m(2), respectively. Four patients suffered of obesity co-morbidities. Mean time between RYGB and reconversion was 21±18.8 months. Mean weight, BMI, and % excess weight loss at reconversion was 66.8±21.7 kg, 20.1±7 kg/m(2), and 23.7±55%, respectively. The procedure involved dismantling both gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy, reanastomosing gastric pouch to gastric remnant, and proximal alimentary limb end to distal biliary limb end. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 132.2±29.5 min. There were no conversions to open surgery and no early complications. Gastrogastrostomy was performed manually (four) and by linear stapler (four), and jejunojejunostomy by linear stapler (eight). Mean hospital stay was 7.7±3.5 days. After a mean follow-up of 18.3±9.2 months, two patients continued to further lose weight, two patients maintained the same weight, and four patients presented weight regain. Gastroesophageal reflux disease appeared in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reconversion of RYGB to OA is feasible and safe. Dumping syndrome and intolerance to RYGB-induced restriction are resolved. The anatomy remains one of the aspects besides nutritional and psychological factors in cases of reconversion for weight issues.
Authors: Geoffrey J Service; Geoffrey B Thompson; F John Service; James C Andrews; Maria L Collazo-Clavell; Ricardo V Lloyd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-07-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Benjamin T Bikman; Donghai Zheng; Walter J Pories; William Chapman; John R Pender; Rita C Bowden; Melissa A Reed; Ronald N Cortright; Edward B Tapscott; Joseph A Houmard; Charles J Tanner; Jihyun Lee; G Lynis Dohm Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kaspar Z'graggen; Ahmed Guweidhi; Rudolf Steffen; Natascha Potoczna; Ruggero Biral; Frank Walther; Paul Komminoth; Fritz Horber Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-04-26 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Todd Andrew Kellogg; John P Bantle; Daniel B Leslie; James B Redmond; Bridget Slusarek; Therese Swan; Henry Buchwald; Sayeed Ikramuddin Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Guilherme M Campos; Martynas Ziemelis; Rodis Paparodis; Muhammed Ahmed; Dawn Belt Davis Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-06-29 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Ben Gys; Philip Plaeke; Bas Lamme; Thierry Lafullarde; Niels Komen; Anthony Beunis; Guy Hubens Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.129