Literature DB >> 20824448

Economic considerations in the provision of treatments for rare diseases.

Christopher McCabe1, Richard Edlin, Jeff Round.   

Abstract

Orphan Drug legislation in the USA, Europe and elsewhere has been incredibly successful in promoting the development of new treatments for rare diseases. Historically, payers have constructed special schemes that have facilitated patient access given the small total budget impact of these treatments. However, whilst each disease is rare, the number of licensed orphan drugs is growing rapidly. This, in conjunction with the high prices claimed for these treatments, has increased the total budget impact of orphan drugs. In the medium term, the feasibility of omitting orphan drugs from value for money type assessments is doubtful. The arguments for a special status for orphan drugs in reimbursement processes are reviewed in this article, and it is concluded that these arguments do not generally stand up to critical assessment. A new paradigm for the development and purchase of orphan drugs may be required. Given the strong parallels between the challenges of neglected diseases in developing countries and orphan diseases in developed countries, policy tools developed for neglected diseases; such as Public Private Partnerships and Advance Market Commitments, might be fruitfully applied in the orphan drug arena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20824448     DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  9 in total

1.  Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status?

Authors:  Steven Simoens; David Cassiman; Marc Dooms; Eline Picavet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Targeting the hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 in macrophages highly increases the anti-inflammatory potency of dexamethasone.

Authors:  Jonas H Graversen; Pia Svendsen; Frederik Dagnæs-Hansen; Jakob Dal; Gabriele Anton; Anders Etzerodt; Mikkel D Petersen; Peter A Christensen; Holger J Møller; Søren K Moestrup
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  Economic Evaluation of Stiripentol for Dravet Syndrome: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Elliott; Bláthnaid McCoy; Tammy Clifford; George A Wells; Doug Coyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Principles for consistent value assessment and sustainable funding of orphan drugs in Europe.

Authors:  Laura Gutierrez; Julien Patris; Adam Hutchings; Warren Cowell
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients' health needs?

Authors:  R Rodriguez-Monguio; T Spargo; E Seoane-Vazquez
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 6.  Assessing the value of orphan drugs using conventional cost-effectiveness analysis: Is it fit for purpose?

Authors:  Maarten J Postma; Declan Noone; Mark H Rozenbaum; John A Carter; Marc F Botteman; Elisabeth Fenwick; Louis P Garrison
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 7.  Clinical studies in lysosomal storage diseases: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Pol F Boudes
Journal:  Rare Dis       Date:  2013-10-07

8.  Childhood interstitial lung disease due to surfactant protein C deficiency: frequent use and costs of hospital services for a single case in Australia.

Authors:  Neil J Hime; Dominic Fitzgerald; Paul Robinson; Hiran Selvadurai; Peter Van Asperen; Adam Jaffé; Yvonne Zurynski
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 9.  Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.

Authors:  Tamás Zelei; Mária J Molnár; Márta Szegedi; Zoltán Kaló
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.123

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.