OBJECTIVES: To explore GPs' considerations in decision-making regarding sick-listing of patients suffering from SHC. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of data from nine focus-group interviews. SETTING: Three cities in different regions of Norway. Participants. A total of 48 GPs (31 men, 17 women; aged 32-65) participated. The GPs were recruited when invited to a course dealing with diagnostic practice and assessment of sickness certificates related to patients with composite SHCs. RESULTS: Decisions on sick-listing patients with SHCs were regarded as a very challenging task. Trust in the patient's own story and self-judgement was deemed crucial, but many GPs missed hard evidence of illness and loss of function. Several factors that might influence decision-making were identified: the patients' ability to present their story to evoke sympathy, the GP's prior knowledge of the patient, and the GPs' own experience as a patient and their tendency to avoid conflicts. The approach to the task of sick-listing differed from patient-led cooperation to resistant confrontation. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Issuing sickness certification in patients with composite health complaints is considered challenging and burdensome. It is seen as mainly patient-driven, and the decisions vary according to GPs' attitudes, beliefs, and personalities. Guiding the GPs to a more focused awareness of the decision process should be considered.
OBJECTIVES: To explore GPs' considerations in decision-making regarding sick-listing of patients suffering from SHC. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of data from nine focus-group interviews. SETTING: Three cities in different regions of Norway. Participants. A total of 48 GPs (31 men, 17 women; aged 32-65) participated. The GPs were recruited when invited to a course dealing with diagnostic practice and assessment of sickness certificates related to patients with composite SHCs. RESULTS: Decisions on sick-listing patients with SHCs were regarded as a very challenging task. Trust in the patient's own story and self-judgement was deemed crucial, but many GPs missed hard evidence of illness and loss of function. Several factors that might influence decision-making were identified: the patients' ability to present their story to evoke sympathy, the GP's prior knowledge of the patient, and the GPs' own experience as a patient and their tendency to avoid conflicts. The approach to the task of sick-listing differed from patient-led cooperation to resistant confrontation. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Issuing sickness certification in patients with composite health complaints is considered challenging and burdensome. It is seen as mainly patient-driven, and the decisions vary according to GPs' attitudes, beliefs, and personalities. Guiding the GPs to a more focused awareness of the decision process should be considered.
Authors: Britt Arrelöv; Kristina Alexanderson; Jan Hagberg; Anna Löfgren; Gunnar Nilsson; Sari Ponzer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Antonius J M Schellart; Henny Mulders; Romy Steenbeek; Johannes R Anema; Herman Kroneman; Jan Besseling Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stein Nilsen; Kirsti Malterud; Erik L Werner; Silje Maeland; Liv Heide Magnussen Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Målfrid Råheim; Liv Heide Magnussen; Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse; Åshild Lunde; Torild Jacobsen; Astrid Blystad Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Date: 2016-06-14
Authors: Silje Maeland; Erik L Werner; Marianne Rosendal; Ingibjorg H Jonsdottir; Liv H Magnussen; Stein Atle Lie; Holger Ursin; Hege R Eriksen Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 2.581