Literature DB >> 20822303

Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.

Kirk N Olsen1, Catherine J Stevens, Julien Tardieu.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigate psychological, methodological, and domain-specific characteristics of loudness change in response to sounds that continuously increase in intensity (up-ramps), relative to sounds that decrease (down-ramps). Timbre (vowel, violin), layer (monotone, chord), and duration (1.8 s, 3.6 s) were manipulated in Experiment 1. Participants judged global loudness change between pairs of spectrally identical up-ramps and down-ramps. It was hypothesized that loudness change is overestimated in up-ramps, relative to down-ramps, using simple speech and musical stimuli. The hypothesis was supported and the proportion of up-ramp overestimation increased with stimulus duration. Experiment 2 investigated recency and a bias for end-levels by presenting paired dynamic stimuli with equivalent end-levels and steady-state controls. Experiment 3 used single stimulus presentations, removing artifacts associated with paired stimuli. Perceptual overestimation of loudness change is influenced by (1) intensity region of the dynamic stimulus; (2) differences in stimulus end-level; (3) order in which paired items are presented; and (4) duration of each item. When methodological artifacts are controlled, overestimation of loudness change in response to up-ramps remains. The relative influence of cognitive and sensory mechanisms is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822303     DOI: 10.1037/a0018389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Using historical accounts of harpsichord touch to empirically investigate the production and perception of dynamics on the 1788 Taskin.

Authors:  Jennifer MacRitchie; Giulia Nuti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-11

2.  Interpreting expressive performance through listener judgments of musical tension.

Authors:  Morwaread M Farbood; Finn Upham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-30

3.  Temporal asymmetries in auditory coding and perception reflect multi-layered nonlinearities.

Authors:  Thomas Deneux; Alexandre Kempf; Aurélie Daret; Emmanuel Ponsot; Brice Bathellier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Contextual effects on loudness judgments for sounds with continuous changes of intensity are reflected in nonauditory areas.

Authors:  Oliver Behler; Stefan Uppenkamp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Perceptual Temporal Asymmetry Associated with Distinct ON and OFF Responses to Time-Varying Sounds with Rising versus Falling Intensity: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Bing Cheng; Tess K Koerner; Robert S Schlauch; Keita Tanaka; Masaki Kawakatsu; Iku Nemoto; Toshiaki Imada
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-08-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.