Literature DB >> 20822297

Multiple mechanisms in the perception of face gender: Effect of sex-irrelevant features.

Masashi Komori1, Satoru Kawamura, Shigekazu Ishihara.   

Abstract

Effects of sex-relevant and sex-irrelevant facial features on the evaluation of facial gender were investigated. Participants rated masculinity of 48 male facial photographs and femininity of 48 female facial photographs. Eighty feature points were measured on each of the facial photographs. Using a generalized Procrustes analysis, facial shapes were converted into multidimensional vectors, with the average face as a starting point. Each vector was decomposed into a sex-relevant subvector and a sex-irrelevant subvector which were, respectively, parallel and orthogonal to the main male-female axis. Principal components analysis (PCA) was performed on the sex-irrelevant subvectors. One principal component was negatively correlated with both perceived masculinity and femininity, and another was correlated only with femininity, though both components were orthogonal to the male-female dimension (and thus by definition sex-irrelevant). These results indicate that evaluation of facial gender depends on sex-irrelevant as well as sex-relevant facial features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20822297     DOI: 10.1037/a0020369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Contrast: A Case from Central Africa.

Authors:  Šimon Pokorný; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-08-24

2.  Skin and bones: the contribution of skin tone and facial structure to racial prototypicality ratings.

Authors:  Michael A Strom; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Shunan Zhang; P Matthew Bronstad; Hoon Koo Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The morphometrics of "masculinity" in human faces.

Authors:  Philipp Mitteroecker; Sonja Windhager; Gerd B Müller; Katrin Schaefer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Perceptual training to improve hip fracture identification in conventional radiographs.

Authors:  Weijia Chen; David HolcDorf; Mark W McCusker; Frank Gaillard; Piers D L Howe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patterns of correlation of facial shape with physiological measurements are more integrated than patterns of correlation with ratings.

Authors:  S Windhager; F L Bookstein; E Millesi; B Wallner; K Schaefer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire.

Authors:  Weiqing Zhang; Amanda C Hahn; Ziyi Cai; Anthony J Lee; Iris J Holzleitner; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceived facial age and biochemical indicators of glycemia in adult men and women.

Authors:  Agnieszka Żelaźniewicz; Judyta Nowak-Kornicka; Adriana Osochocka; Bogusław Pawłowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  A new data-driven mathematical model dissociates attractiveness from sexual dimorphism of human faces.

Authors:  Koyo Nakamura; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world.

Authors:  Karel Kleisner; Petr Tureček; S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček; Jaroslava Varella Valentova; Robert Mbe Akoko; Juan David Leongómez; Silviu Apostol; Marco A C Varella; S Adil Saribay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.