Literature DB >> 20822288

Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat.

Chad E Forbes1, Toni Schmader.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, a retraining paradigm was used to test the effects of attitudes and stereotypes on individuals' motivation and cognitive capacity in stereotype-threatening contexts. Women trained to have a more positive math attitude exhibited increased math motivation (Study 1). This effect was not observed for men but was magnified among women when negative stereotypes were either primed subtly (Study 2) or indirectly reinforced (Study 3). Although attitudes had no effect on working memory capacity, women retrained to associate their gender with being good at math exhibited increased working memory capacity (Studies 3 and 4), which in turn mediated increased math performance (Study 4) in a stereotype-threatening context. Results suggest that although positive attitudes can motivate stigmatized individuals to engage with threatening domains, stereotypes need to be retrained to give them the cognitive capacity critical for success. Implications for interventions to reduce stereotype threat are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822288      PMCID: PMC2976624          DOI: 10.1037/a0020971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  34 in total

1.  Using SAT-grade and ability-job performance relationships to test predictions derived from stereotype threat theory.

Authors:  Michael J Cullen; Chaitra M Hardison; Paul R Sackett
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2004-04

2.  Conceptualizing control in social cognition: how executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping.

Authors:  B Keith Payne
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-10

Review 3.  Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

Authors:  Bertram Gawronski; Galen V Bodenhausen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Coping with stereotype threat: denial as an impression management strategy.

Authors:  William von Hippel; Courtney von Hippel; Leanne Conway; Kristopher J Preacher; Jonathan W Schooler; Gabriel A Radvansky
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-07

Review 5.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Michael Johns; Chad Forbes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  High stakes testing in higher education and employment: appraising the evidence for validity and fairness.

Authors:  Paul R Sackett; Matthew J Borneman; Brian S Connelly
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2008 May-Jun

7.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.

Authors:  C M Steele
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-06

Review 8.  Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.

Authors:  D J Bem
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: examining the influence of emotion regulation.

Authors:  Michael Johns; Michael Inzlicht; Toni Schmader
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11

10.  A metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environments.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Chad E Forbes; Shen Zhang; Wendy Berry Mendes
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-02-18
View more
  8 in total

1.  Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Benjamin Lewis; W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Sport Exerc Perform Psychol       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 2.  Stigma in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Anna K Mueller; Anselm B M Fuermaier; Janneke Koerts; Lara Tucha
Journal:  Atten Defic Hyperact Disord       Date:  2012-07-08

3.  The Role of Stereotype Threat in Ethnically Minoritized Students' Science Motivation: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study of Achievement and Persistence in STEM.

Authors:  Delaram A Totonchi; Tony Perez; You-Kyung Lee; Kristy A Robinson; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol       Date:  2021-09-15

4.  Distracted by the Unthought - Suppression and Reappraisal of Mind Wandering under Stereotype Threat.

Authors:  Carolin Schuster; Sarah E Martiny; Toni Schmader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Establishing the Research Agenda for Increasing the Representation of Women in Engineering and Computing.

Authors:  Kathleen Buse; Catherine Hill; Kathleen Benson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-19

6.  Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT).

Authors:  Chad E Forbes; Katherine A Cameron; Jordan Grafman; Aron Barbey; Jeffrey Solomon; Walter Ritter; Daniel S Ruchkin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Why Is Working Memory Performance Unstable? A Review of 21 Factors.

Authors:  Rachael N Blasiman; Christopher A Was
Journal:  Eur J Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12

8.  Stereotype-based stressors facilitate emotional memory neural network connectivity and encoding of negative information to degrade math self-perceptions among women.

Authors:  Chad E Forbes; Rachel Amey; Adam B Magerman; Kelly Duran; Mengting Liu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.