Literature DB >> 20821657

Macroinvertebrate responses to insecticide application between sprayed and adjacent nonsprayed ditch sections of different sizes.

Theo C M Brock1, J Dick M Belgers, Ivo Roessink, Jan G M Cuppen, Steve J Maund.   

Abstract

Under typical agricultural use of an insecticide, it is likely that only part of an edge-of-field drainage ditch will be directly contaminated by spray drift. The response, including recovery, of aquatic macroinvertebrates in sprayed ditch sections may be affected by immigration of organisms from adjacent nonsprayed ditch sections, but also the population dynamics in nonsprayed sections (refuges) may be affected by nearby contaminated patches (known as action at a distance). Experimental ditches were used to study the influence of the presence of nearby refuges on the responses of macroinvertebrates in ditch sections directly sprayed with the insecticide lufenuron, and vice versa. The treatment regimes differed in the proportion of the ditch (0, 33, 67, and 100% of surface area) that was sprayed to reach a lufenuron concentration of 3 microg/L in the water column of the sprayed ditch section. In sprayed ditch sections, clear treatment-related effects were observed for adult midges in the emergence traps and for aquatic arthropods (mainly juveniles) in the artificial substrate/sweep net samples. The extent in magnitude and duration of effects in sprayed ditch sections was overall larger when a larger proportion of the ditch was sprayed and/or the distance to the refuge was larger. In nonsprayed ditch sections of partially treated ditches, treatment-related effects were absent or minor for macroinvertebrates that predominantly dwell on or in the sediment compartment, particularly at a larger distance from the sprayed ditch sections. More mobile arthropods that predominantly dwell in the water column showed clear treatment-related effects in the nonsprayed ditch sections as well, but action at a distance was smaller if a smaller proportion of ditch was treated. Copyright 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20821657     DOI: 10.1002/etc.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  3 in total

1.  Responses of macroinvertebrate communities to pesticide application in irrigated rice fields.

Authors:  Cristina Stenert; Íris C M F de Mello; Mateus M Pires; Débora S Knauth; Naoki Katayama; Leonardo Maltchik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Effect of thiram and of a hydrocarbon mixture on freshwater macroinvertebrate communities in outdoor stream and pond mesocosms: I. Study design, chemicals fate and structural responses.

Authors:  Yannick Bayona; Marc Roucaute; Kevin Cailleaud; Laurent Lagadic; Anne Bassères; Thierry Caquet
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  The minimum detectable difference (MDD) and the interpretation of treatment-related effects of pesticides in experimental ecosystems.

Authors:  T C M Brock; M Hammers-Wirtz; U Hommen; T G Preuss; H-T Ratte; I Roessink; T Strauss; P J Van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.