Literature DB >> 20821649

Retention-release characteristics of triclocarban and triclosan in biosolids, soils, and biosolids-amended soils.

Sampson Agyin-Birikorang1, Matt Miller, George A O'Connor.   

Abstract

Transport models that incorporate retention/release characteristics of organic compounds in soils and sediments typically assume that organic-carbon normalized partition coefficients (K(OC)) apply to all solid matrices and that the partitioning process is completely reversible. Partition coefficients (K(d)) (from which the K(OC) was calculated), and retention/release characteristics of triclocarban (TCC) and triclosan (TCS) in biosolids, soils, and biosolids-amended soils were determined. Four soils of different physicochemical properties amended with biosolids at 10 g/kg, together with unamended soils, and several biosolids were separately spiked with either [(14)C]TCC or [(14)C]TCS for the various determinations. The hysteresis coefficient values of the two compounds were consistently <1 in all three solid matrices, suggesting strong hysteresis. Multiple desorption steps (24 h each) over several days revealed incomplete desorption of the two compounds from all three solid matrices. The K(d) values determined in biosolids (log K(d) 3.34 +/- 0.13 for TCC and 3.76 +/- 0.39 for TCS) were greater than those determined in soils (log K(d) 1.71 +/- 0.09 for TCC and 2.25 +/- 0.26 for TCS) and biosolids-amended soils (log K(d)1.90 +/- 0.16 for TCC and 2.31 +/- 0.19 for TCS), however, the K(OC) values of all three solid matrices were similar (log K(OC) of 3.82 +/- 0.16 for TCC and 4.26 +/- 0.31 for TCS). Thus, it was concluded that a single or a narrow range of K(OC) values for TCC and TCS may be appropriate to describe retention of the compounds in soils and sediments. However, models that assume complete reversibility of the retention/release processes of the compounds in soils and sediments may not adequately describe the retention/release characteristics of the compounds in soils and sediments, especially when the chemicals are biosolids borne. Copyright 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20821649     DOI: 10.1002/etc.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Activated carbon as a means of limiting bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticides, triclosan, triclocarban, and fipronil from sediments rich in organic matter.

Authors:  Viet D Dang; Kevin J Kroll; Samuel D Supowit; Rolf U Halden; Nancy D Denslow
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Population level effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in Daphnia magna exposed to pulses of triclocarban.

Authors:  Anne Simon; Thomas G Preuss; Andreas Schäffer; Henner Hollert; Hanna M Maes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Basin-scale emission and multimedia fate of triclosan in whole China.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Zhang; Guang-Guo Ying; Zhi-Feng Chen; Jian-Liang Zhao; You-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and triclocarban on several eukaryotic cell lines: elucidating cytotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and reactive oxygen species generation.

Authors:  Anne Simon; Sibylle X Maletz; Henner Hollert; Andreas Schäffer; Hanna M Maes
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.703

5.  Degradation of Triclosan and Carbamazepine in Two Agricultural and Garden Soils with Different Textures Amended with Composted Sewage Sludge.

Authors:  Yanqiu Shao; Kai Yang; Rongchang Jia; Chao Tian; Ying Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.