Literature DB >> 20821538

Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis.

Fadri Gottschalk1, Tobias Sonderer, Roland W Scholz, Bernd Nowack.   

Abstract

Information on environmental concentrations is needed to assess the risks that engineered nanomaterials (ENM) may pose to the environment. In this study, predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) were modeled for nano-TiO2, carbon nanotubes (CNT) and nano-Ag for Switzerland. Based on a life-cycle perspective, the model considered as input parameters the production volumes of the ENMs, the manufacturing and consumption quantities of products containing those materials, and the fate and pathways of ENMs in natural and technical environments. Faced with a distinct scarcity of data, we used a probabilistic material flow analysis model, treating all parameters as probability distributions. The modeling included Monte Carlo and Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations as well as a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. The PEC values of the ENMs in the different environmental compartments vary widely due to different ENM production volumes and different life cycles of the nanoproducts. The use of ENM in products with high water relevance leads to higher water and sediment concentrations for nano-TiO2 and nano-Ag, compared to CNTs, where smaller amounts of ENM reach the aquatic compartments. This study also presents a sensitivity analysis and a comprehensive discussion of the uncertainties of the simulation results and the limitations of the used approach. To estimate potential risks, the PEC values were compared to the predicted-no-effect concentrations (PNEC) derived from published data. The risk quotients (PEC/PNEC) for nano-TiO2 and nano-Ag were larger than one for treated wastewater and much smaller for all other environmental compartments (e.g., water, sediments, soils). We conclude that probabilistic modeling is very useful for predicting environmental concentrations of ENMs given the current lack of substantiated data. Copyright (c) 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20821538     DOI: 10.1002/etc.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  26 in total

1.  Effects of fullerene (C60), multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and hydroxyl and carboxyl modified single wall carbon nanotubes on riverine microbial communities.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; M J Waiser; G D W Swerhone; J Roy; V Tumber; A Paule; A P Hitchcock; J J Dynes; D R Korber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Residence time effects on phase transformation of nanosilver in reduced soils.

Authors:  Allison Rick VandeVoort; Ryan Tappero; Yuji Arai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Melissa A Maurer-Jones; Ian L Gunsolus; Catherine J Murphy; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Toxicity of differently sized and coated silver nanoparticles to the bacterium Pseudomonas putida: risks for the aquatic environment?

Authors:  Marianne Matzke; Kerstin Jurkschat; Thomas Backhaus
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Uptake route and resulting toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Eisenia fetida earthworm exposed through Standard OECD Tests.

Authors:  Nerea Garcia-Velasco; Maite Gandariasbeitia; Amaia Irizar; Manuel Soto
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Ingrid L Bergin; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Int J Biomed Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2013

7.  Prospective environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver T-shirts.

Authors:  Tobias Walser; Evangelia Demou; Daniel J Lang; Stefanie Hellweg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  TiO2 nanoparticles are phototoxic to marine phytoplankton.

Authors:  Robert J Miller; Samuel Bennett; Arturo A Keller; Scott Pease; Hunter S Lenihan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Simulation tool for assessing the release and environmental distribution of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Haoyang Haven Liu; Muhammad Bilal; Anastasiya Lazareva; Arturo Keller; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  The effects of silver nanoparticles on intact wastewater biofilms.

Authors:  Zhiya Sheng; Joy D Van Nostrand; Jizhong Zhou; Yang Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.