Literature DB >> 20821154

Evaluation of chest and abdominal exposure dose appropriate for a digital image reader system incorporating a columnar-crystal structured phosphor plate and a contrast-detail phantom.

Kyoko Saito1, Souichi Hiramoto, Tsutomu Gomi, Naoki Muramoto, Misayo Seki, Kaoru Tsukimura, Hitoshi Suzuki.   

Abstract

We evaluated a newly developed digital image reader incorporating a columnar-crystal structured phosphor plate (CPP) to determine its effectiveness for chest and abdominal exposures by assessing contrast-detail (C-D) curves and image quality figure values obtained from a C-D phantom. With the help of five radiologic technologists with 5 years or more of experience in the interpretation of plain radiographs, we assessed chest and abdominal radiographic films that had undergone image processing. The exposure dose required for obtaining the same image quality under chest exposure conditions (110 kV) was 66% of that necessary for a conventionally used computed radiography system incorporating a powder phosphor plate, whereas the percentage under abdominal exposure conditions (85 kV) was 82%. The rate of dose reduction varied depending on the anatomic region radiographed, the exposure conditions applied, and the method of image processing employed. Because the CPP has a higher X-ray detection efficiency than the hitherto-used powder phosphor plate, its use has to potential to reduce the patients' radiation exposure dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20821154     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-008-0035-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  4 in total

1.  [Optimization of the chest exposure condition with a contrast-detail phantom: evaluation of the flat-panel versus computed radiography systems].

Authors:  Emi Kinoshita; Yoshiyuki Umezu; Kazuhisa Ogawa; Toyoyuki Katou; Hisao Arimura; Hideki Yoshikawa; Yoshiharu Higashida; Masafumi Ooki; Fukai Toyofuku
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2004-07

2.  Quality analysis of DSA equipment.

Authors:  M A Thijssen; H O Thijssen; J L Merx; M P van Woensel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.

Authors:  Klaus Bacher; Peter Smeets; Ludo Vereecken; An De Hauwere; Philippe Duyck; Robert De Man; Koenraad Verstraete; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Comparison of indirect CsI/a:Si and direct a:Se digital radiography. An assessment of contrast and detail visualization.

Authors:  F Fischbach; T Freund; M Pech; M Werk; C Bassir; B Stoever; R Felix; J Ricke
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Investigation of optimal display size for viewing T1-weighted MR images of the brain using a digital contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Hideki Fujita; Nao Kuwahata; Hiroyuki Hattori; Hiroshi Kinoshita; Haruyuki Fukuda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.