Literature DB >> 20820128

Energy cost and cardiovascular response to upper and lower limb rhythmic exercise with different equipments in normal-weight and severely obese individuals.

C L Lafortuna1, S Chiavaroli, F Rastelli, M De Angelis, F Agosti, A Patrizi, A Sartorio.   

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of the study was to assess energy expenditure and cardiovascular response to rhythmic activity with 6 machines exercising different arm and leg muscle groups in normal-weight (NW) and obese (OB) individuals.
METHODS: In 16 extremely OB subjects and 15 NW controls, oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (HR), blood lactate (LA) concentration and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were determined during submaximal rhythmic exercise at different intensities obtained by increasing the frequency of the movement (FOM) with each machine. Peak VO2 (VO2p) for each equipment was determined with incremental tests up to exhaustion, whereas maximal VO2 was estimated at cycle ergometer.
RESULTS: Net energy cost (Enet) of exercise increased (p<0.001) for effect of FOM, in both NW and OB with all equipments. Enet was higher in OB than NW during submaximal exercise with Chest/Back, Shoulder Press/Lat Pull, and Leg Press. Higher VO2p were attained with lower limbs than with upper limbs, in both NW (p<0.001) and OB (p<0.001). At the same VO2 (relative to maximal), HR, LA, and RPE were similar in NW and OB but higher during arm than leg activity (p<0.001), while at the same VO2 (relative to VO2p) no difference was detected.
CONCLUSION: Enet of rhythmic exercise is higher in OB than NW with machines requiring wide displacement of large body segments. For both NW and OB, physiological responses and RPE are importantly affected by the relative activation of involved muscles. LA concentration is an important determinant of RPE, independent of the limb in activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820128     DOI: 10.1007/BF03347043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  27 in total

1.  Physiological responses to upper body exercise on an arm and a modified leg ergometer.

Authors:  J Kang; E C Chaloupka; M A Mastrangelo; J Angelucci
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  A Must; J Spadano; E H Coakley; A E Field; G Colditz; W H Dietz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Intermodal comparison of energy expenditure at exercise intensities corresponding to the perceptual preference range.

Authors:  N M Moyna; R J Robertson; C L Meckes; J A Peoples; N B Millich; P D Thompson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Responses to arm and leg ergometry.

Authors:  R G Eston; D A Brodie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Total body fat does not influence maximal aerobic capacity.

Authors:  M Goran; D A Fields; G R Hunter; S L Herd; R L Weinsier
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-07

Review 6.  The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water.

Authors:  P E di Prampero
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  The energetic and cardiovascular response to treadmill walking and cycle ergometer exercise in obese women.

Authors:  Claudio L Lafortuna; Fiorenza Agosti; Raffaela Galli; Carlo Busti; Stefano Lazzer; Alessandro Sartorio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition.

Authors:  H C Lukaski; W W Bolonchuk; C B Hall; W A Siders
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1986-04

9.  Physical activity ratios for various commonly performed sedentary and physical activities in obese adolescents.

Authors:  S Lazzer; C Busti; R Galli; S Boniello; F Agosti; C Lafortuna; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Effect of exercise modality on ratings of perceived exertion at various lactate concentrations.

Authors:  R K Hetzler; R L Seip; S H Boutcher; E Pierce; D Snead; A Weltman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Kinematic, Cardiopulmonary, and Metabolic Responses of Overweight Runners While Running at Self-Selected and Standardized Speeds.

Authors:  Laura Ann Zdziarski; Cong Chen; Marybeth Horodyski; Kevin R Vincent; Heather K Vincent
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Effect of mechanical and metabolic factors on motor function and fatigue in obese men and women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  C L Lafortuna; F Prinelli; F Adorni; F Agosti; A De Col; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Objectively measured adherence to physical activity among patients with coronary artery disease: Comparison of the 2010 and 2020 World Health Organization guidelines and daily steps.

Authors:  Prisca Eser; Nathalia Gonzalez-Jaramillo; Selina Weber; Jan Fritsche; Riccardo Femiano; Charlotte Werner; Flurina Casanova; Arjola Bano; Oscar H Franco; Matthias Wilhelm
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.