Literature DB >> 20819959

Identification of protein binding surfaces using surface triplet propensities.

Wissam Mehio1, Graham J L Kemp, Paul Taylor, Malcolm D Walkinshaw.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The ability to reliably predict protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions is important for identifying druggable binding sites and for understanding how proteins communicate. Most currently available algorithms identify cavities on the protein surface as potential ligand recognition sites. The method described here does not explicitly look for cavities but uses small surface patches consisting of triplets of adjacent surface atomic groups that can be touched simultaneously by a probe sphere representing a solvent molecule. A total of 455 different types of triplets can be identified. A training set of 309 protein-ligand protein X-ray structures has been used to generate interface propensities for the triplets, which can be used to predict their involvement in ligand-binding interactions.
RESULTS: The success rate for locating protein-ligand binding sites on protein surfaces using this new surface triplet propensities (STP) algorithm is 88% which compares well with currently available grid-based and energy-based approaches. Q-SiteFinder's dataset (Laurie and Jackson, 2005. Bioinformatics, 21, 1908-1916) was used to show the favorable performance of STP. An analysis of the different triplet types showed that higher ligand binding propensity is related to more polarizable surfaces. The interaction statistics between triplet atoms on the protein surface and ligand atoms have been used to estimate statistical free energies of interaction. The ΔG(stat) for halogen atoms interacting with hydrophobic triplets is -0.6 kcal/mol and an estimate of the maximal ΔG(stat) for a ligand atom interacting with a triplet in a binding pocket is -1.45 kcal/mol. AVAILABILITY: Freely available online at http://opus.bch.ed.ac.uk/stp. Website implemented in Php, with all major browsers supported. CONTACT: m.walkinshaw@ed.ac.uk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819959     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  8 in total

1.  webPDBinder: a server for the identification of ligand binding sites on protein structures.

Authors:  Valerio Bianchi; Iolanda Mangone; Fabrizio Ferrè; Manuela Helmer-Citterich; Gabriele Ausiello
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Identification of binding pockets in protein structures using a knowledge-based potential derived from local structural similarities.

Authors:  Valerio Bianchi; Pier Federico Gherardini; Manuela Helmer-Citterich; Gabriele Ausiello
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Optimal ligand descriptor for pocket recognition based on the Beta-shape.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Kim; Chung-In Won; Jehyun Cha; Kichun Lee; Deok-Soo Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Promotion of presynaptic filament assembly by the ensemble of S. cerevisiae Rad51 paralogues with Rad52.

Authors:  William A Gaines; Stephen K Godin; Faiz F Kabbinavar; Timsi Rao; Andrew P VanDemark; Patrick Sung; Kara A Bernstein
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Exploring the composition of protein-ligand binding sites on a large scale.

Authors:  Nickolay A Khazanov; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Structure of a highly conserved domain of Rock1 required for Shroom-mediated regulation of cell morphology.

Authors:  Swarna Mohan; Debamitra Das; Robert J Bauer; Annie Heroux; Jenna K Zalewski; Simone Heber; Atinuke M Dosunmu-Ogunbi; Michael A Trakselis; Jeffrey D Hildebrand; Andrew P Vandemark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of computational methods for virus-host protein interaction prediction: a case study on novel Ebola-human interactions.

Authors:  Anup Kumar Halder; Pritha Dutta; Mahantapas Kundu; Subhadip Basu; Mita Nasipuri
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Predicting binding sites from unbound versus bound protein structures.

Authors:  Jordan J Clark; Zachary J Orban; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.