OBJECTIVE: Standardized surveillance syndromes do not exist but would facilitate sharing data among surveillance systems and comparing the accuracy of existing systems. The objective of this study was to create reference syndrome definitions from a consensus of investigators who currently have or are building syndromic surveillance systems. DESIGN: Clinical condition-syndrome pairs were catalogued for 10 surveillance systems across the United States and the representatives of these systems were brought together for a workshop to discuss consensus syndrome definitions. RESULTS: Consensus syndrome definitions were generated for the four syndromes monitored by the majority of the 10 participating surveillance systems: Respiratory, gastrointestinal, constitutional, and influenza-like illness (ILI). An important element in coming to consensus quickly was the development of a sensitive and specific definition for respiratory and gastrointestinal syndromes. After the workshop, the definitions were refined and supplemented with keywords and regular expressions, the keywords were mapped to standard vocabularies, and a web ontology language (OWL) ontology was created. LIMITATIONS: The consensus definitions have not yet been validated through implementation. CONCLUSION: The consensus definitions provide an explicit description of the current state-of-the-art syndromes used in automated surveillance, which can subsequently be systematically evaluated against real data to improve the definitions. The method for creating consensus definitions could be applied to other domains that have diverse existing definitions.
OBJECTIVE: Standardized surveillance syndromes do not exist but would facilitate sharing data among surveillance systems and comparing the accuracy of existing systems. The objective of this study was to create reference syndrome definitions from a consensus of investigators who currently have or are building syndromic surveillance systems. DESIGN: Clinical condition-syndrome pairs were catalogued for 10 surveillance systems across the United States and the representatives of these systems were brought together for a workshop to discuss consensus syndrome definitions. RESULTS:Consensus syndrome definitions were generated for the four syndromes monitored by the majority of the 10 participating surveillance systems: Respiratory, gastrointestinal, constitutional, and influenza-like illness (ILI). An important element in coming to consensus quickly was the development of a sensitive and specific definition for respiratory and gastrointestinal syndromes. After the workshop, the definitions were refined and supplemented with keywords and regular expressions, the keywords were mapped to standard vocabularies, and a web ontology language (OWL) ontology was created. LIMITATIONS: The consensus definitions have not yet been validated through implementation. CONCLUSION: The consensus definitions provide an explicit description of the current state-of-the-art syndromes used in automated surveillance, which can subsequently be systematically evaluated against real data to improve the definitions. The method for creating consensus definitions could be applied to other domains that have diverse existing definitions.
Authors: David A Thompson; David Eitel; Christopher M B Fernandes; Jesse M Pines; James Amsterdam; Steven J Davidson Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2006-05-24 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: J A Jernigan; D S Stephens; D A Ashford; C Omenaca; M S Topiel; M Galbraith; M Tapper; T L Fisk; S Zaki; T Popovic; R F Meyer; C P Quinn; S A Harper; S K Fridkin; J J Sejvar; C W Shepard; M McConnell; J Guarner; W J Shieh; J M Malecki; J L Gerberding; J M Hughes; B A Perkins Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Richard S Hopkins; Catherine C Tong; Howard S Burkom; Judy E Akkina; John Berezowski; Mika Shigematsu; Patrick D Finley; Ian Painter; Roland Gamache; Victor J Del Rio Vilas; Laura C Streichert Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Sharon K Greene; Jie Huang; Allyson M Abrams; Debra Gilliss; Mary Reed; Richard Platt; Susan S Huang; Martin Kulldorff Journal: Foodborne Pathog Dis Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 3.171
Authors: Geneviève Cadieux; David L Buckeridge; André Jacques; Michael Libman; Nandini Dendukuri; Robyn Tamblyn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stephanie W Haas; Debbie Travers; Anna Waller; Deepika Mahalingam; John Crouch; Todd A Schwartz; Javed Mostafa Journal: Online J Public Health Inform Date: 2014-10-16