BACKGROUND: Phacotrabeculectomy can be performed using one-site or two-site incisions. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of one-site versus two-site phacotrabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with coexisting cataract and glaucoma. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to identify randomized controlled clinical trials comparing one-site with two-site phacotrabeculectomy. Studies meeting our predefined criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy estimates were measured by weighted mean difference (WMD) for the percentage intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline to end point, relative risk (RR) for the proportion of patients with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.5 or better after surgery and complete success rates. Tolerability estimates were measured by RR for adverse events. All of outcomes were reported with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Data were synthesised by Stata 10.1 for Windows. RESULTS: Two-site phacotrabeculectomy was associated with greater reductions in IOP than the one-site procedure (WMD: -5.99, 95%CI: -10.74 - -1.24, P = 0.01). A greater proportion of patients also achieved a BCVA of 0.5 or better (RR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.74 - 1.12, P = 0.36) and the target IOP without anti-glaucoma medication at the study end point (RR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.83 - 1.07, P = 0.34) after two-site than one-site phacotrabeculectomy, but the differences were not significant. There were no significant differences in adverse events between two surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Two-site phacotrabeculectomy is superior to one-site phacotrabeculectomy in reducing IOP, but other post-operative effects are similar. One-site and two-site phacotrabeculectomies have similar adverse event rates.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Phacotrabeculectomy can be performed using one-site or two-site incisions. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of one-site versus two-site phacotrabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with coexisting cataract and glaucoma. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to identify randomized controlled clinical trials comparing one-site with two-site phacotrabeculectomy. Studies meeting our predefined criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy estimates were measured by weighted mean difference (WMD) for the percentage intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline to end point, relative risk (RR) for the proportion of patients with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.5 or better after surgery and complete success rates. Tolerability estimates were measured by RR for adverse events. All of outcomes were reported with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Data were synthesised by Stata 10.1 for Windows. RESULTS: Two-site phacotrabeculectomy was associated with greater reductions in IOP than the one-site procedure (WMD: -5.99, 95%CI: -10.74 - -1.24, P = 0.01). A greater proportion of patients also achieved a BCVA of 0.5 or better (RR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.74 - 1.12, P = 0.36) and the target IOP without anti-glaucoma medication at the study end point (RR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.83 - 1.07, P = 0.34) after two-site than one-site phacotrabeculectomy, but the differences were not significant. There were no significant differences in adverse events between two surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Two-site phacotrabeculectomy is superior to one-site phacotrabeculectomy in reducing IOP, but other post-operative effects are similar. One-site and two-site phacotrabeculectomies have similar adverse event rates.
Authors: Asieh Golozar; Yujiang Chen; Kristina Lindsley; Benjamin Rouse; David C Musch; Flora Lum; Barbara S Hawkins; Tianjing Li Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389